Cardinal George Pell to appeal to high court over child sexual abuse conviction

Share Button

Former Vatican treasurer has maintained his innocence after the Victorian court of appeal ruled two-to-one against his appeal

Tue 17 Sep 2019

Lawyers for Cardinal George Pell have lodged a special leave application with the high court to try to appeal his historical sex abuse convictions, which will be his final avenue to have his conviction overturned.

The high court on Tuesday confirmed it had received the application through its Melbourne registry.

The lodging of the appeal does not mean the high court will agree to hear the case. First, the matter will be considered by a panel of two to three judges, and will either be dismissed or approved. The parties may be called to a brief hearing for further consideration. A decision about whether special leave to appeal will be granted is usually made on the same day as the hearing.

At least five and sometimes all seven justices of the high court will hear the appeal if it is granted. The appeals process can take several months, and is unlikely to be considered before 2020. In the meantime, Pell remains in Melbourne assessment prison, receiving letters and visits from his supporters. Pell has maintained his innocence throughout the process.

The 78-year-old was sentenced to a six-year prison sentence for sexually abusing two 13-year-old former choirboys at St Patrick’s cathedral when he was the archbishop of Melbourne in 1996. He will be eligible for parole after serving a term of three years and eight months.

In August, the Victorian court of appeal – the highest court in the state – dismissed Pell’s appeal. He had 28 days to appeal to the high court, with lawyers filing his application at the 11th hour on Tuesday. However, filing at the last minute is not unusual.

The jury had not been unreasonable in convicting Pell on one count of sexual penetration of a child under the age of 16 and four counts of an indecent act against a child under the age of 16, the Victorian court of appeal chief justice, Anne Ferguson, and appeal court president justice, Chris Maxwell, previously found.

A third judge, Mark Weinberg, disagreed, finding the complainant was inclined to embellish aspects of his testimony and that he could not exclude the possibility that some of what he said was concocted. But in the court of appeal, judges are required only to reach a majority decision, which meant Pell’s appeal failed.

But in the appeal filed to the high court, Pell’s lawyers say Ferguson and Maxwell were wrong. “There did remain a reasonable doubt as to the existence of any opportunity for the offending to have occurred,” the filing said.

“The majority [of judges] erred by finding that their belief in the complainant required the applicant (Pell) to establish that the offending was impossible in order to raise and leave a doubt.”

In a criminal trial it is up to prosecutors to establish proof, not the defendant to prove innocence, and the filing says the Victorian appellant judges wrongfully reversed this onus of proof.

One of Pell’s victims died of an accidental drug overdose in 2014 at age 30. His father is being represented by Lisa Flynn from Shine Lawyers. She said her client was “beyond disappointed” to hear of the appeal.

“This painful period of his life is simply not coming to an end which continues to take a toll on his health,” Flynn said. “Every time Pell takes his legal fight to the next level our client is reminded of the disgusting abuse he inflicted on his son as a young choirboy.

“He has no doubt George Pell sexually abused his son and that his son’s sudden turmoil and devastation of his life was a direct result of the abuse he suffered inside Melbourne’s St Patrick’s cathedral at the hands of George Pell. Although he knew this was a possibility, it is still very hard for him to take when his son’s abuser was found guilty by a unanimous jury.”


Cardinal Pell appeals convictions to Australian High Court

Vatican News

18 September 2019

Lawyers for Cardinal George Pell presented his final appeal against sexual abuse convictions to Australia’s High Court on Tuesday.

According to Cardinal Pell’s lawyers, the dissenting opinion of Justice Mark Weinberg, one of three judges of the Supreme Court of the Australian state of Victoria, could provide a motive to overturn his conviction.

Cardinal Pell was convicted in February on historical charges of sexual abuse of a minor.

A jury unanimously found him guilty of sexually abusing two teenage boys in the sacristy of Melbourne’s Cathedral in 1996, when he was the local Archbishop.

He maintains his innocence.

Australia’s High Court is not obliged to hear Cardinal Pell’s appeal.

Position of the Holy See

Following the Victoria Supreme Court’s decision to uphold his convictions, the Director of the Holy See Press Office, Matteo Bruni, said:

“As in other cases, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith is awaiting the outcome of the ongoing proceedings and the conclusion of the appellate process prior to taking up the case.

“As was stated by the Holy See Press Office on 26 February, the Holy Father had already confirmed the precautionary measures imposed on Cardinal Pell upon his return to Australia, that is, as is the norm, the prohibition from exercising public ministry and from any voluntary contact whatsoever with minors”.

6 Responses to Cardinal George Pell to appeal to high court over child sexual abuse conviction

  1. bc says:

    Special leave to appeal granted to Cardinal Pell by the High Court of Australia:

    • Phil Johnson says:

      Hoping he loses this final appeal and begins to get the message that his past abuses were and are, unacceptable. If he wins his appeal, it does not absolve him of his abuses, just that the legal defense arguments won the day.

  2. NatLog says:

    Strictly speaking Cardinal Pell has NOT been granted leave to appeal at the High Court in Canberra, Australia. High Court Justice Johsua Edelman has requested that defence and prosecution counsel appear before a full sitting of the High Court to present motions for and against granting Cardinal Pell leave to appeal

    This may seem a pedantic point to make but its is significant that they have elected to purse this route rather than grant leave to appeal

  3. bc says:

    The appeal of Cardinal Pell`s conviction will involve legal yoga and mind reading.
    if any of the evidence showed impossibility in one respect or another, then the jury must have had a doubt

    The magic word being if. That`s all Cardinal Pell`s lawyers have to advocate: a hypothesis about a theory about a hunch about a feeling about a speculation. There is no case for Cardinal Pell. He was convicted as per the burden of proof. An unreasonable doubt isn`t a reasonable doubt. Even if the jury had unreasonable doubts about his guilt nothing reasonable could acquit him.

    Now just watch Pope Francis retire soon after Cardinal Pell is finally convicted. Cardinal Pell will have taken notes while he was banking at the Vatican. And Mr. Pell will be even more powerful than Cardinal Pell ever was.

  4. bc says:

    High Court ordered Pell’s convictions be quashed and verdicts of acquittal be entered in their place.

    • Phil Johnson says:

      I feel so bad for the victim who had the courage to come forward. Hard to fathom how a unanimous verdict by a jury plus a rejected appeal, can all be overturned by a higher court. I guess money and power talk.

Leave a Reply