Huels: Father or ex-priest John Huels

Share Button

John Huels

American Servite priest (Servites of Mary – osm).  Canon lawyer. Possibly now an ex-priest.

St. Paul U Faculty of Canon Law website May 2018

1976:   Ordained a priest for the Servites of Mary

1993:  Provincial for the Eastern Province of the Servites in the USA (Chicago).

1994:  allegations of sexual abuse in mid or late 70s reported to Servites by fellow Servite priest Michael Bland.  Bland was 15 when the abuse transpired.

Bland was ordered by his superiors to reconcile with Huels.  When he refused, the Servites allegedly turned against him.  Bland left the Servites and the priesthood.  Huels stayed. (Bland became a psychologist).

Huels stepped down from his position with the Servites shortly after Bland came forward.

1997:  Father John Huels was hired to  teach canon law at Ottawa’s Saint Paul University

March 2002:   Bland wrote to the Dean of Canon Law at Saint Paul’s to express his “concern and wonderment” as to why Huels was teaching at USP.  Huels was by then Vice Dean at St. Paul’s University.

August 2002:  Huels on medical leave of absence citing severe depression -said to be considering leaving the priesthood.

At the time USP Rector Dale Schlitt said that given the controversies surrounding sexual abuse in the USA  the university “couldn’t hire Father Huels today” if the allegations were known.  Huels was gone.

2010:  Huels is teaching canon law at Saint Paul University . 

Huels has been back teaching canon law for for several years.  On several occasions in the recent years he has been a  speaker at canon law conferences. I have heard he has left the priesthood.  He is still a known sexual predator – teaching canon law, … a pontifically chartered university.


2018:  Full professor at Saint Paul University


Email exchange with Ottawa’s Vicar General Msgr. Kevin Beach re Fathers Ed MacNeil omi and John Huels and Msgr. John Renken


06 September 2002:  Influential Priest-Canonist is Abuser of Member of Bishops Review Board

12 August 2002:  Action on Sexually Abusive Priests Comes Only After Media Exposure

09 August 2002:   Priest was hired because system failed, accuser says  (second page is poor quality.  I will try to find time to get a text version.  For now, it can be read if enlarged on screen)

2010-2011:    Course description for Saint Paul University Faculty of  Canon Law  Note John Huels’ name.  Also note Father John Renken’s name.  Renken was run out of Springfiled Illinois after Catholics found out about his homosexual relationship with Father Kenneth Steffen.

And yes, that is Father Frank Morrissey omi, the Oblate canon lawyer and former Dean of the faculty who gave canonical advice to the scandal-plagued Diocese of Alexandria-Cornwall and many another dioceses in similar situations, testified as an expert witness at the Cornwall Public Inquiry, and  was instrumental in the production of the CCCB’s sex abuse guidedlines From Pain to Hope.


  Justice Delayed Brings Vindication, Not Peace; Victim Remains Troubled as Priest Steps Down

The Washington Post

August 7, 2002

Alan Cooperman

Michael Bland waited a long time for vindication. But when it finally arrived yesterday, there was no sweetness to it.

When the nation’s Roman Catholic bishops listened to sexual abuse victims in Dallas in mid-June, one of the most troubling stories came from Bland, a former priest in the Chicago-based Order Friar Servants of Mary, known as the Servites.

In 1994, nearly seven years after ordination, Bland revealed to superiors that he had been sexually abused as a teenager by an older member of the same order. He was quickly called to Rome to discuss the case. But after he refused to reconcile with his alleged abuser, the Servites just as quickly closed ranks against him.

“The priesthood lost me, but kept the perpetrator,” Bland told the bishops in Dallas, noting that the alleged abuser had recently been promoted to full professor and vice dean at a major Catholic university.

Bland’s presentation helped prod the bishops to require the permanent removal from ministry of any priest who has sexually abused a minor. He spoke so eloquently but so circumspectly — never naming the alleged abuser or their religious order — that the bishops appointed him to a national review board of lay Catholics charged with ensuring that the zero-tolerance policy is carried out.

Yet Bland’s own case languished, for two reasons: his alleged abuser was living in Canada, and he was a member of a religious order. The policy adopted by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops applies only to the United States, and only directly to priests serving in dioceses. Priests who belong to religious orders, such as Jesuits, Franciscans and Dominicans, answer to the heads of those orders unless they are assigned to parish jobs.

Yesterday, in a brief statement that made no mention of Bland, St. Paul University in Ottawa announced that the Rev. John M. Huels has temporarily left his posts as a professor and vice dean of canon law.

“Upon recommendation of a psychiatrist and a clinical psychologist, Dr. Huels informed me that he will be on medical leave for the treatment of severe depression,” said the university’s rector, the Rev. Dale M. Schlitt.

Also yesterday, the Archbishop of Ottawa, Marcel Gervais, issued a statement saying that Huels has “announced his intention to leave the Servite order and seek laicization,” the church’s term for leaving the priesthood. “It is my hope that his voluntary actions today will bring peace to all involved,” Gervais added.

Bland confirmed in an interview that Huels was his alleged abuser, but said the news did not bring any peace. “There are no winners in this,” he said. “I’m sure that this is a difficult time for John Huels. It is for me, too.”

Huels did not return messages left on his office answering machine seeking comment. No one answered his home telephone.

Gervais also is chancellor of St. Paul. In his statement, he said that when Huels was hired several years ago, he was not told “of any inappropriate behavior” in Huels’s past. It was not until in mid- June, he said, that “I was made aware of a situation” involving the priest.

Bland said, however, he had written to the dean of canon law in March, “expressing my concern and wonderment why my perpetrator was teaching at St. Paul University” and questioning Huels’s promotion to vice dean.

In the past week, Bland said, he received two phone calls from Gervais, who explained that he was not bound by the U.S. bishops’ policies but nevertheless invited Bland to fly to Canada, at the archbishop’s expense, to discuss the allegations.

Bland said he told the archbishop that he saw no point in a meeting until Gervais took action against Huels.

This week, the heads of all the male religious orders in the United States will gather behind closed doors in Philadelphia to discuss the application of the Dallas policy to their priests.

A spokeswoman, Marita Eddy, said the Conference of Major Superiors of Men is likely to accept the requirement for removal from ministry of any priest who has abused a minor. But she said its members might decide that, unlike diocesan priests, some religious order priests could remain in office jobs in which they have no contact with children.

“The person would not just be thrown out, but would be given a chance to turn his life around,” she said.

Bland said he did not know if the bishops’ review board would take a stand on the conference’s final decision. “I personally would hope that we do not create a double standard for priests in the United States,” he said.

4 Responses to Huels: Father or ex-priest John Huels

  1. From Pain to Hope was a disaster. Somewhere I have an analysis that I did of the document. As I remember it, it leaned heavily on the work of James Loftus who ran Southdown, a treatment facility for “priests with problems”. Dale Crampton, a priest on your list, was there and let out – seems his problem was with alcohol! Needless to say, he re-offended as soon as he got out.

    The victims got short shrift in this booklet from the CCCB. The primary concerns seem to be with the priests and the church.

    The problem is with the institution itself (The RCC) that will not follow even its own inadequate rules on the matter. And St. Paul’s is a joke when it comes to this issue. They actually train pastoral counsellors – may whatever God exists find it in its heart to forgive them for they truly do not know what they are doing.

  2. Gregory says:

    I was a postulant during those early days at Austin Morini Priory in St. Louis, where Michael Bland was also.  I remember the few times of John Huels visits, which I recall was focused on visits in whispers and closed doors.  I recollect at from the time forward how odd were the people running that place. For me it was a blessing to leave that Priory, in so many ways from introduction to alchohol, smoking and very unfocused men who were more interested in monetary support then actually helping a person find the right path.  The St. Louis Priory, and those who ran it were a failure. Too many secrets, strange behaviors, and not a place for young men coming into the ministry hoping to find sincere direction.  I was so sad to learn of Michaels blight of years ago, my heart sank, and I could not forget the times John Huels visited Detroit, and some parishioners spoke ill of their suspect of him! I am not surprised as well for the the Bishops response then.  We lived one block away from a Conventual Francsican Priory then where the men were ready to invite me to see them ‘anytime’ for special massages! 

  3. Michael says:


    Someone pointed out your post.  Thank you for your words of support and rememberence.



Leave a Reply