Heads back in the sand

Share Button

The Vatican’s Circular Letter to the bishops of the world has been released.  I’ve looked it over a few times now and, alas, try as I might I could find nothing which assures Catholics in Canada that things are about to  change for the better.

The Letter of course is just that, a letter.  And all it does is suggest the bishop develop “guidelines.”  There are no teeth here.  Just words.  I honestly can’t see what the point is.

As it stands, each conference of bishops around is to prepare guidelines, and copies of completed guidelines are to be sent to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith by end May 2012. 

That’s a full year.

For guidelines.  No teeth.  Just “guidelines.”

I don’t know what I had hoped for, but I always do try to hold out hope for something  positive.

 Yet again, I was disappointed.

I will limit myself to the following observations and comments:

(1)  Spiritual assistance for victims

According to the Letter, the Church should be “committed to” the spiritual and psychological assistance of victims.

This is perhaps the one sign I initially thought of as progress.  It is rare indeed to hear concerns regarding the spiritual well-being of victims, and, for that matter, their families.  However, what good is it to talk of being committed to the spiritual assistance of victims when the victims won’t go near the Church precisely because they view the Church as harbouring, protecting and/or covering up for known clerical predators .

How can spiritual assistance be provided to the lost sheep if the latter don’t trust and won’t darken the door of a Church because Church officials refuse to take the steps required to regain that lost  trust and show by their actions that they view clerical child sex abuse as an abominable crime and treat those who enact such crimes against children as unfit to wear the Roman collar or bear the title “Father”? 

(2)   “Safe environments”

It seems  some countries  have initiated educational and prevention programs within the Church to ensure “safe environments” for minors

It is all well and good to teach others to look for signs of sex abuse after the fact.  But, what does that do to eliminate child sex abuse?  And, how does it create a “safe” environment?

I suggest there will be no “safe havens” for minors as long as neither we nor they know who the who the known molesters are in our midst.

(3) Contradiction

Pope John Paul II is quoted as follows:  “there is no place in the priesthood and religious life for those who would harm the young”

Why then are known clerical molesters still in the priesthood?

And why, at a later point in the Letter, do we read:

the return of a cleric to public ministry is excluded if such ministry is a danger for minors or a cause of scandal for the community.

Which is it?  Is it that,  as Pope John PAul II said,  no place in the priesthood for these priests? 

Or, is it that there is a place for them if “such a ministry”  is not a damage to minors?

Or, is it that there is a place for them as long is it does not cause scandal?

It seems to me that “no place in the priesthood and religious life for those who would harm the young” means precisely that.  Why then are these men not laicized (defrocked)? Why all the dancing about exclusions to public ministry?  More on this in a minute.

4) Support of Priests

Note the following para: 

3. The accused cleric is presumed innocent until the contrary is proven. Nonetheless the bishop is always able to limit the exercise of the cleric’s ministry until the accusations are clarified. If the case so warrants, whatever measures can be taken to rehabilitate the good name of a cleric wrongly accused should be done.


Note that there is no demand or even suggestion that a priest accused of child sex abuse should be removed from ministry until the allegations have been “clarified.” 

And, what does “clarified” mean?

IS this perhaps a problem with translation?  Still, this is the approved English translation of the Letter. 

No matter.  The problem here as I see it is that there is no demand whatever that a priest be removed from active ministry the moment there is an allegation of sex abuse against him.

The bishop can “limit” the exercise of his ministry.  “Can.”   Not ‘must.’  “Can.”

Has there been no progress at all?

(5)  Recycling

I addressed this in part above:

i.) the return of a cleric to public ministry is excluded if such ministry is a danger for minors or a cause of scandal for the community.

IF such ministry is a danger for minors? 

Where does the “if” come from?

Is there a single soul who can prove or promise that beyond a shadow of a doubt a known molester will not re-offend?

I know of none.

And perhaps it’s a case of translation, and perhaps a small point,  but does it not look there as though it’s the “ministry” which is deemed the danger  to children and not the clerical predator himself?

Anyway, sad to say those in the Vatican who compiled this Letter seem to think that it is all fair and good for a known molester to return to “public” ministry IF there is NO danger  for minors.

As I say, show me one instance where it is known that a clerical predator will  NOT re-offend when he is returned to public ministry and that all children who cross his path are not thereby willfully placed at risk.

And that’s not just children in a parish, or a hospital.  What of the children of friends?  What of the children of friends who have been denied the truth of this priest’s proclivities for sex with children?  Who’s stopping those kind and unwitting souls from inviting “Father” to join them for a meal or two?  Or joining them on vacation?

That aside, I cringe to think that Church officials  believe that a priest who has sexually abused a child are worthy to be, or to be called, priests.

Then there’s the second part:

The return of a predatory priest to “public ministry” is excluded if it would

  “cause of scandal for the community”?

Where have “they” (Vatican officials) been for the past 20 years?

It’s a given that if the community isn’t told that their priest is a known molester – no problem.  And it’s a given that as soon as the community finds out, – big problem.

I know of no instance whereby a known molester has been publicly introduced to parishioners at Masses, or patents in a hospital, or students in a  school as a known child molester.  Are there any? 

I believe there are instances in which a chosen few tolerant souls from a parish are advised and that that is bent to its max to  constitute advising the faithful. I honestly know of no case of recycling into a parish where everyone was told.

Besides, can anyone think of an instance in which the presence of a known molester-priest in “public” ministry would NOT cause scandal?  I can’t.

Is the idea then that if these priests can be quietly hoisted upon trusting and unwitting Catholics it’s alright?

If that’s the case, then it’s heads back in the sand:  maintain the status quo.

Enough for now,


This entry was posted in Bishops, Clerical sexual predators, Scandal, Vatican and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Heads back in the sand

  1. Larry Green says:

    Sylvia, as far I’m concerned you’re assessment of the “letter” is bang on! This for certain is an area on which we agree fully. It is this type of superficial “image structuring” on the part of the Vatican that so unjustly deepen the wounds of victims and blast the foundations of those who have built there faith on an institution who professed to represent the truth as though she were God Himself. She has become so ensnared by habitually receiving (sustaining) life from her own lies , illusions and deceit that now they are not able to see that there is no life left in these ways and in her obstinate and unreasonable refusal to humbly seek life from the “truth” i.e. God , she is surely on her last breath.
    It is this kind of pathetic , condescending, pig headed , degrading things that mr. pope does to make it very clear to the world that the catholic church has no relevance to the well being ( psychologically, spiritually or any way) to the world in general nor to any human being at all.

  2. Lieve Halsberghe says:

    Sylvia, you say enough for now, but I want more!! (from you, not the Vatican middle ages).
    As we already expected it is all talk (blablablablabla) and no action.
    But what do you expect. I have actually encountered people close to Dejaeger who turn out NOT to have a conscience! Pretty scary!

  3. JG says:

    “The Church”, the bureaucracy, has been so concerned about protecting the “envelop” that they forgot the Message, the Divine Message. All they would really need is genuine faith….If they fail to be totally upfront, to completely surrender their fate…it is simply for lack of Faith…
    The “bureaucracy” is in need of some profound cleansing for a return to the basics for a happy, productive and genuine participation in a society, in a world we all long for. To be relevant again, the second Commandment should be their one and only concern. Instead, “The Church” has been flying around with the legal and accounting pigeons of this world…and we all know what they leave behind!
    How long before they get advise from someone who is not afraid…or totally blind to the fate and Faith of others…
    I feel very sad when I consider what that Institution has done to all of us. Instead of finding answers we only come up with more questions every day and we now expect only more lies, denials or complete silence…
    Very sad and totally lacking in Christian values. The Vatican is becoming an empty shell, a warehouse for antiques.

  4. JG says:

    Just thought I could suggest to those who feel frustrated, need to get their feelings , their frustration out where it needs to to resonate…plant some seeds, make some noise to “The voice of the pope”(lower case definitely intended!), radio vatican at the following: sedoc@vatiradio.va
    Express yourself in whatever language, let your message out loud and clear and pass it on . After a few thousand messages expressing our disbelief in “the church’s” response to this ongoing sacrilege, maybe someone in the glass tower will feel the little stones all the little “Davids” are hurling at their prostitution of the Truth and their degradation of the Message. If anyone still feels the organized response stops with lowly priests, you’ll never find enough sand to hide your head. They definitely want us to “think locally while they act globally”!!…
    Remember ONE child was too many. There are no acceptable excuses, delays, denials or even the thought that it will ever be “business as usual” ever again as it was for so many years.
    Anyone with a better address, pls pass it on…spring is upon us , time to plant a new garden, one seed at a time…

  5. Donelda MacDonnell says:

    Have you read the latest Vatican scandal concerning Cardinal Don Riccardo Seppio in Italy ? Have been sick to my stomach about it since reading it last week. D

  6. JG says:

    While reading the above three links, I once more had a picture from my youth come to mind…On my grandparents farm, they only kept a few animals but after a while the window on the back wall of the barn would be completely blocked with the manure being thrown out every day…It would need to be cleaned, shoveled from the outside…

  7. Donelda MacDonnell says:

    Great analogy JG. All the Sh!t from inside the Vatican’s corruption has to be cleaned up by those outside, and a sincere congratulations goes out to Sylvia and her friend for bringing this monster to justice. May we hear of more of these criminals getting their just rewards soon !! The man even has a charge of beatiality against him. Makes me shake my head in wonder about what these people are capable of. The devil surely has taken hold of their minds, bodies and their souls.

Leave a Reply