I have a problem. Seems someone has somehow hacked my website and added a link to an ad for a male potency product. Do not click in “logekey” on the Menu at the left. Ditto “Online” which is currently showing as a broken link but was not put there by me.
Can anyone help me with this? I have no idea how it got there and am unable to remove it with my software? I have been trying for sometime to sort out how to remove the two links and just can’t. I have an idea for success which I will try after I post this. I will aslo get in touch with my web host but in the meantime if anyone has a sure fire way to adress the problem I would appreciate any assistance I can get.
First, a quick note re word of appeal as it was reported by the media.
The headlines read “Dunlop a no show in court, the implication being Perry was supposed to show and, because he was a no show somehow he erred.
The truth of the matter is that the Court of Appeal was advised by Perry last Spring that he would NOT be appearing in person at his appeal. He had the option of filing his appeal in writing. He chose that option. His appeal was filed last Spring. It is with the court.
A reporter from Canadian Press, which first put the story out that Perry was scheduled to appear on 18 January 2010, appears to have read the documents on file at Divisional Court. He/she would have read that Perry’s intent was to appeal in writing – not in person. For whatever reason the CP reporter wrote the following:
Dunlop’s appeal is scheduled to be heard Monday, but he is self-represented and it’s unclear whether he will attend in person.
Why no mention of the fact that Perry explicitly stated in writing – in his appeal – that he would not appear in person?
The article drawn from the CP coverage also noted that
The Crown didn’t notify Dunlop of the hearing date and attempts to reach him over the past week have not been fruitful, according to information in Dunlop’s court file.
That is fact. The Crown failed to notify Perry that the appeal was scheduled until days before the 18th.
I am a little confused about all of this. Obviously there was an onus on the Crown to notify Perry of the scheduled date for the appeal, but why the apparent buzz over whether or not he would appear?
It makes no sense to me. What it has done in the long run is drag the matter out for who knows how much longer.
Begging time? If yes, for whom? and why?
Yet again something isn’t making sense.
The Crown on the appeal, by the way, is none other than David Humphrey, the very man who fought tooth and nail on the AG’s behalf – successfully – to put Perry behind bars.
What exactly does it take for the powers that be at the office of the Attorney General to recognize a conflict of interest? And how many conflicts does it take for the AG to actually declare a conflict of interest when it comes to persecuting Perry Dunlop?
I hope I am wrong, but right now it’s looking like yet again the cards are being carefully and painstakingly stacked against the whistleblower.
Three new media articles are posted. The link and a brief comment on each:
(1) 25 January 2010: ‘Reckless’ delay in support for victims
Another country heard from!
John Swales is suddenly back in the picture! and looking for the Ontario taxpayer to fund unlimited counselling for every single sex abuse victim in Ontario!!
What can I say? I am at a loss for words 🙁 I do believe common sense has flown right ut the window on this one!
Goes to show that protecting, nurturing and/or harbouring clerical child molesters is a costly business in more ways than one.
Also, I see Bishop Brian Dunning is to be installed as Lahey’s replacement today. Did ‘they’ take pains to pick a man with a squeaky clean slate this time? The people of Antigonish deserve nothing less.
More psychobabble from prominent Canadian Roman Catholics – try to lay the blame anywhere and everywhere but on the sinning priest.
“What has happened in Cornwall is typical of what has happened across Canada,” the bishop said.
Meaning what? What DID happen in Cornwall Bishop Durocher? I for one would like to be enlightened as to what the bishop beleives has been happening all across Canada.
Enough for now,