It’s amazing, a day away from the computer really sets me on my ear. Catch up is hard.
The transcript of yesterday is posted. I believe I am also now caught up on media postings 🙂 Check New to the Site on the Home page.
Note “ Crown says she was disappointed with Dunlop – Inquiry”
“when you contrast what the victims went through, the days of gruelling cross-examination –…. I was truly disappointed that Mr. Dunlop did not show the same kind of courage the victims did.”
Perhaps Narozniak forgets? “The victims” didn’t get near the stand at Leduc “trial” #2. There was not an ounce of interest in what “the victims” had to say about what Jacques Leduc did or not do them. It was all Perry, Perry, Perry. All technicalities – with a mind to getting Leduc off the hook.
That aside, what a cheap shot! Very revealing!!
Perry had been sandbagged. She won’t admit it outright but Narozniak knows that all too well – she was part of the sandbagging. The truth of the matter is that Perry couldn’t have been sandbagged without her. She knows that too. It was only Narozniak’s dalliance with Marie Henein(Leduc) which allowed Perry Dunlop to be deceptively called to testify as a Crown, not defence, witness.
Perry logically thought he was being called to give testimony about his limited and benign contact with C-16’s mother. In truth he was being called by the Crown to scapegoat him and literally set him up for vilification and tarring and feathering by Marie Henein.
Narozniak thinks that’s fair game? Really?! And she thinks that once Perry caught on to the Narozniak-Henein game plan he had no right to ask for a lawyer, never mind be both taken aback that he had been duped by the Crown and upset that Henein was doing nothing remotely Crown-like in there?
And Narozniak is upset that Perry didn’t show the same courage “the victims” did? What a cheap dirty and unbecoming shot to emit from the mouth of a Crown.
I suppose one could or might say Narozniak and Henein conspired to entrap Perry? By entrap I mean “To lure into danger, difficulty, or a compromising situation.”
And I suppose that that particular kind of conspiring isn’t a conspiracy because I suppose Crowns can conspire, even if they’re conspiring with those whom “the victims” and we unwashed public might consider to be the ‘enemy.’
I shall carry on with the transcript after I take care of a few odds and ends at home. Will blog as I get a handle on various bits and pieces of testimony.
Enough for now,