Are Roman Catholic clerical sexual predators a protected species?

Share Button

I want to briefly touch upon what happened in Ottawa twenty long years when it came to clerical sexual abuse allegations. I do so for two reasons: (1) to show what happened to those who dared point a finger at priest or bishop back then, and (2) two of the players have Cornwall connections.

This story entails a Roman Catholic teacher in the Archdiocese of Ottawa. I won’t name him. He has suffered enough and I doubt that he wants his name blasted back into the public domain. I’ll call him Jack.

Jack taught at a Roman Catholic school. It was around 1983.

Through various means Jack began to receive reports that a Father Dale Crampton was sexually molesting young boys. Father Dale Crampton, a very popular priest, happened to be chaplain to the RCMP. He also happened to Jack’s parish priest.

Jack was alarmed and concerned for the well-being and safety of the young lads in his school and parish. He managed to over-ride his admiration for Crampton and dug in to find out if there was any substance to the allegations. He concluded there was indeed.

Jack’s baptism by fire into the world of whistle-blowing on clerical sexual abusers had begun.

The long and short of it is that in time Jack’s name was out and about and his phone began to ring off the hook. There were calls with sexual abuse allegations against this priest, that priest and the other one – and allegations against Bishop John Beahan, auxiliary to Archbishop Joseph Aurele Plourde (Archdiocese of Ottawa).

I’ll skip the rest and take you to two items of interest regarding Jack and the Cornwall connections, specifically those related to Archbishop Joseph Aurele Plourde and Ottawa lawyer Michael Neville: .

Joseph Aurele Plourde
Plourde you may recall was auxiliary bishop to Rosario Brodeur in the Diocese of Alexandria-Cornwall and actually administered the diocese following Brodeur’s retirement and until the installation of Brodeur’s successor, Adolphe Proulx.

What do you suppose Archbishop Plourde did when he got wind that Jack had information about a number of clerical abusers in the Archdiocese of Ottawa?

He threatened to excommunicate Jack!

That’s a fact. Archbishop Plourde threatened to excommunicate the whistleblower rather than try to protect the young lads in the diocese.

Now if that’s not an abuse of authority, lack of concern for children and outright intimidation I don’t know what is!!

Jack wasn’t excommunicated. But he was treated like a leper by clergy, bishops and laymen alike and eventually, of his own volition, did as so many in his situation do – he washed his hands of the Roman Catholic Church.

One can only ponder the fate of those who dared to approach Plourde with similar allegations during his time in the Diocese of Alexandria-Cornwall.

Michael Neville

Father Crampton stood trial in 1986.

His lawyer? Michael Neville.

Yes, the same Michael Neville who defended Charlie (Father Charles MacDonald) and eventually got him off the hook, and the same Michael Neville who is representing Charlie at the inquiry, and the same Micheal Neville who is undoubtedly at this very moment pulling out all stops to keep Charlie’s alleged victims from taking the stand.

Now listen to this. . .

During Father Crampton’s sexual abuse trial Neville nabbed Jack, took him aside and said he wanted to talk to him.

About what?

Well, Michael Neville wanted tell Jack that he (Neville) would sue him (Jack) if Jack didn’t stop talking about Bishop Beahan and his sexual proclivities!

Neville didn’t sue Jack. Perhaps because the allegations against Beahan became too numerous? Or perhaps because the soon-to-be-charged Beahan died 14 March 1988 after suffering a massive stroke while assisting with confirmations in the Diocese of Pembroke? For whatever reason, the threat never materialized into fact. But it was very real.

Neville did manage to win Crampton a suspended sentence and two-years probation after successfully convincing Judge Keith Flanigan that society would best be protected and served if the priest were cared for by doctors and psychiatrists rather than incarcerated. The “sentence” was appealed (July 1987) and Crampton was sentenced to eight months in jail. After his release Crampton, a canon layer, was quietly recycled to the Diocese of London Ontario where he worked with the diocesan marriage tribunal.

As for Beahan’s sexual proclivities for both young boys and his fellow clergyman, that oozed into the public domain during the sex abuse trial of Ottawa clerical paedophile Ken Keeler. Keeler victims testified that boys at Keeler’s summer camp would push bunk beds against the door to barricade themselves into their rooms to keep Beahan out, and there were eyewitness accounts of Beahen and Keeler doing their sexual thing to/with each other. (Keeler, who suddenly changed his not guilty plea to guilty when the Beahan filth started to ooze, was defended by William Carroll, the same lawyer representing the Ontario Provincial Police Association at the Cornwall Inquiry)

That’s a very brief bird’s eye view of how allegations of clerical sexual abuse were handled in the Archdiocese of Ottawa twenty long years ago. I will leave it at that.

But it does sound strangely familiar, doesn’t it?

Roman Catholic clerical sexual predators had the legal world and the judiciary and who knows who else in their back pocket back then. They were a protected species.

Has anything changed?

Enough for now,


This entry was posted in Clerical sexual predators. Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Are Roman Catholic clerical sexual predators a protected species?

  1. J. Boettger says:

    Well they shouldn’t have been protected Sylvia. Those bastards should have paid for what they did. Cowards, sickening people that if there really is a god, then he will not forgive them for taking the innocence away from these kids.
    I don’t go to church anymore, I don’t care to hear what they have to say.
    I know Ken Keeler. I won’t call him father. Why would I?
    I wish I could say so much more, but may they ALL rot in hell.

  2. Sylvia says:

    I wrote two articles on Keeler’s trial and aftermath. My first ever time in a courtroon, let alone sex abuse trial of a popular Roman Catholic priest. Listened to Sister Eleanor and a Catholic prinicial take the stand to testify to Keeler’s ‘good’ character AFTER he entered his guilty plea. Then watched a host of parishioners rally to Keeler’s defence and/or minimize his sins and crimes at St. John the Apostle when Archbishop Marcel Gervais went to do damage control.

    All a sad and sorry eye opener for me. A horrific crime. These men do not belong in the priesthood.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Sylvia, you wrote 2 articles about Keeler’s trial? Are they available? I cannot find them on your blog.

  4. Sylvia says:

    Yes anonymous, I did write two articles on Father Ken Keeler’s trial, but that was way back then when I was writing for the Orator. I have never posted the Keeler articles on the website because they weren’t Cornwall or inquiry related. Perhaps I will add a page to and use it to post odds and ends on other real and “alleged” Catholic clerical molesters? I could then scan the Keeler articles and post them there.

  5. margaret mary says:

    just came upon this website while looking up “rev dale crampton”. Someone referred to his sexual abuse of others some 20 years ago. How about going back another 20 years?? Oh, look at the new handsome priest Dale Crampton at St. Margaret Mary’s church on Sunnyside in old Ottawa South (appr 1967-69). It was not long before the stories started emerging about his friendliness with the young boys including of course the alter boys. Why was he going to the Mayfair Theatre with them on Saturday afternoons. I moved away from Ottawa in the early 70’s and was shocked and disgusted to learn that he was still under investigation and charged in the late 80’s. Pedophiles Do Not Stop & Cannot Be Reformed. The Roman Catholic church has destroyed many individuals and many families with their Lies, Secrecy & Fear. These threatening & fearful emotions were passed onto the home & this is how we grew up. Feeling guilty & scared and not knowing why. I could go on & on but anyone who has been there knows exactly what I’m talking about. Unfortunately, everyone involved with the Roman Catholic faith gets a bad name. All sexual abusers of children should be put in jail with general population & be sure everyone knows what they are in for…who will save them when the pain is unbearable? They will be praying to their God???

  6. Anonymous says:

    Hello again Sylvia. Have you posted the articles about Keeler yet. I realize that they are not directly connected to the Cornwall situation, but I would like to better understand his time in Ottawa Court. Please post or send me your articles. It would be appreciated.

  7. Sylvia says:

    Hi Anonymous. I am de-decorationg this week 🙁 I am aiming to wrap up with taking the tree down on the weekend for garbage pick-up on Monday. – I absolutely promise that sometime in the process I will dig out the Keeler articles and post them on the `Of Interest`page.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Sylvia, any news on the Keeler articles? I was at the St John the Apostle mass when Gervais repeatedly denied knowing anything about FK’s situation and did not say a word about the victims. Id like to read what you wrote. thanks.

  9. Sylvia says:

    Hi Anonymous

    I had it out a little while ago and emailed it off to someone else who asked for it. I will dig it out again. I had decided not to post it, but, I will 🙂

  10. Sylvia says:

    The two articles I wrote on Keeler back in 1993 are posted Anonymous. I posted the two artciles together as a pdf file – faster and easier to do 🙂

    The file is: January – February 1993: “Deny. Deny. Deny” and May – August 1993: “A Travesty of Justice”. It can be accessed on the Of Interest page under Father Kenneth Keeler.

  11. Anonymous says:

    Thank you Sylvia for taking the time to follow up. Sad story. very sad.

Leave a Reply