Kanasas City Star
16 March 2015 b1:33 PM
By EVA VERGARA Associated Press
In this April 8, 2011 photo, Bishop Juan Barros arrives to the Episcopal Conference of Chile in El Quisco, Chile. Barros has been tapped by Pope Francis to become bishop of a southern Chilean diocese in March 2015, provoking an unprecedented outcry by abuse victims and Catholic faithful who contend he covered up sexual abuse committed by his mentor and superior, Rev. Fernando Karadima, in the 1980s and 90s. Barros has declined to comment publicly on allegations against him.
Juan Carlos Cruz recalls that he and another teen boy would lie down on the priest’s bed, one resting his head at the man’s shoulder, another sitting near his feet. The priest would kiss the boys and grope them, he said, all while the Rev. Juan Barros watched.
“Barros was there, and he saw it all,” Cruz, now a 51-year-old journalist, told The Associated Press.
Barros has been tapped by Pope Francis to become bishop of a southern Chilean diocese this month, provoking an unprecedented outcry by abuse victims and Catholic faithful who contend he covered up sexual abuse committed by his mentor and superior, the Rev. Fernando Karadima, in the 1980s and ’90s. A Vatican investigation found Karadima guilty in 2011 and sentenced the now 84-year-old priest to a cloistered life of “penitence and prayer” for what is Chile’s highest-profile case of abuse by a priest.
Barros had long declined to comment publicly on allegations against him. However, in a letter sent Monday to the priests of the diocese he’ll be overseeing, he said he did not know about Karadima’s abuses when they happened.
“I never had knowledge of, or could have imagined, the serious abuses that this priest committed against the victims,” said the letter, a copy of which was obtained by the AP.
Now bishop for Chile’s armed forces, he has said he learned of Karadima’s abuse through a 2010 news report he saw on television, according to court records.
While not directly accused of abuse, Barros is said by at least three victims to have witnessed the sexual molestation at the Sacred Heart of Jesus church, part of the El Bosque parish that serves an affluent neighborhood of Santiago.
That history has parishioners, clergy and lawmakers in this predominantly Catholic country protesting the pope’s decision to appoint Barros, 58, to become spiritual leader over the diocese in Osorno, about 580 miles (930 kilometers) south of Santiago.
More than 1,300 church members in Osorno, along with some 30 priests from the diocese and 51 of Chile’s 120 members of Parliament, sent letters to Francis in February urging him to rescind the appointment, which was announced in January and is set to take effect on March 21.
They have not heard back and Vatican spokesman the Rev. Federico Lombardi declined to comment on the matter.
Numerous attempts to reach Barros were not successful; nor has he responded to the victims’ accusations or the outcry over his appointment.
The Rev. Peter Kleigel, deputy pastor of the Sacred Heart parish in Osorno, is among those vocally opposing Barros’ arrival.
“We’re convinced that this appointment is not correct because, following canon law, a bishop must be well-regarded,” he told the AP. “We need a bishop who’s credible.”
Such complaints come even as Francis said this month that a minster needs not only God’s blessing, but the blessing of “his people” to do his work.
The controversy is being watched by victims, advocacy groups and others as a test of whether Francis will meet their demands to hold bishops accountable for having ignored or covered up wrongdoing by priests.
Anne Barrett Doyle from BishopAccountability.org, an online resource about abusive priests and complicit bishops, called the appointment “bafflingly inconsistent” with Francis’ promise to root out abuse.
“The pope should have suspended and investigated Barros, not given him another diocese to run,” Barrett Doyle said in an email to the AP.
Karadima led the parish of El Bosque for nearly six decades before allegations came to light in April 2010, when a news investigation into the abuse was broadcast on state television. Two months later, the archbishop of Santiago, Cardinal Francisco Javier Errazuriz, forwarded the allegations to the Vatican amid an eruption of abuse cases globally.
Victims say allegations against Karadima were reported earlier, but were ignored by the cardinal. Errazuriz, who is one of nine cardinals on Pope Francis’ key advisory panel, has acknowledged in court testimony that he failed to act on several abuse allegations because he believed them to be untrue.
Karadima, who lives in isolation at a nun’s convent, is barred from having contact with anyone outside of his own family.
Criminal charges against Karadima were dismissed in 2011 by Judge Jessica Gonzalez because the statute of limitations had expired. However, Gonzalez said that based on her interviews of Cruz and other victims during her yearlong investigation, she determined their accusations were truthful and dated “at least as far back as 1962.”
Victims say they were between ages 14 and 17 when they first were abused by Karadima.
A letter detailing abuse allegations against Karadima was sent by some victims to Cardinal Francisco Fresno in 1982. But authors of the letter accuse Barros, who then was the cardinal’s private secretary, of intercepting it and destroying it.
Francisco Gomez, 52, a publicist who says he was molested by Karadima, told the AP that he signed the letter drafted by two other victims. A friend of his who worked with Fresno, Juan Hoelzzel, told Gomez that Barros ripped it up after reading it — an account that was recorded in testimony during the criminal investigation.
Speaking to the AP, Gomez said he was told by Hoelzzel: “As long as Juan Barros is there, there is no doubt that this will happen again.”
During Karadima’s criminal trial, Barros confirmed that Hoelzzel, who has since died, had worked in the archbishop’s office. Regarding the letter, court documents quote Barros as saying he had “no knowledge” of its existence, adding “I neither deny it nor affirm it.”
In his letter on Monday, Barros said: “I never had knowledge of any complaint regarding Father Karadima while secretary to the Cardinal.”
Barros is one of four bishops who were mentored by Karadima and defended him from the accusations.
Cruz has said that during the time he was abused, Karadima and Barros behaved intimately with one another in his presence.
“I saw Karadima and Juan Barros kissing and touching each other. The groping generally came from Karadima touching Barros’ genitals,” Cruz said in a January letter to Monsignor Ivo Scapolo, the papal nuncio in Chile. Cruz provided a copy of the letter to the AP.
Despite Francis’ pledge to have no tolerance for abuse by priests, James Hamilton, another victim of Karadima’s, said the appointment demonstrates to him that the church “had not changed.”
Hamilton, now a 49-year-old doctor, said Barros enjoyed watching Karadima commit the abuse.
“I saw how Barros watched it all,” he said.
Since 2004, Barros has been bishop for Chile’s military, an appointment made by Pope John Paul II. Previously, he was assistant bishop in the port city of Valparaiso and bishop of the northern city of Iquique.
No representatives of his former dioceses have spoken out in his defense. On Saturday, Chile’s papal nuncio published a letter urging parishioners in Osorno to welcome Barros and “prepare, by way of prayer and good works, for the beginning of his pastoral governance.”
Associated Press reporter Nicole Winfield in Rome contributed to this report.
Bishop Barros will be installed as Bishop of Osorno on Saturday, 21 Marc h 2015. At this point it looks as though the installation will proceed.
The trouble is that Barros is already a bishop, and has been a bishop since April 1995. In fact, he was all of 38 turning 39 when he was appointed Aux. Bishop of Valparaiso, Chile – very young. Some would say he was streamlined.
No matter, the bottom line is that there truly needs to be an investigation into the very serious allegations against Bishop Barros. If those are fact – the man must be defrocked.
Unfortunately the statute of limitations in Chile means there is probably nothing that can be done through the criminal courts? That means the only hope of getting to the truth is through the canonical process in the Church.
Will Pope Francis act to ensure that the office of the bishop is not occupied by a man accused of sexual liaisons with other clergy, and one who was party to the sex abuse of young boys?
Maybe the only way to get to the bottom of these recurring and denied allegations of gross misconduct by Bishops and other highly regarded clergy is for the Vatican to invest in INDEPENDENT reviews by qualified POLYGRAPH
technicians, in case they seriously want to get to the TRUTH!
Francis should end this travesty by any means at his disposal; maybe that is part and reason of his anticipated vision of an early retirement! Maybe he just can’t fight the perverted Vatican system of cover up….!! Probably he is overwhelmed by the magnitude of “the problem”.
I pray that the abused children, whatever their age, stay strong and keep their abusers and enablers accountable…
Glad to see you were able to post jg 🙂
I’ve seen problems with polygraphs too jg. I don’t know what the answer is. I am still thinking it through. No easy answers when those who should be the essence of truth. justice, charity are party to cover-ups
I just posted the latest:
19 March 2015: Chile’s bishops back prelate linked to notorious abuser priest” rel=”nofollow”> Chile’s bishops back prelate linked to notorious abuser priest
The wagons have circled. It’s a done deal.
Pope Francis could bring this to a welcome and necessary end. He is very capable of doing and saying what he wants when and how he chooses. And so, a bishop engulfed in allegations of being party to the sex abuse of young boys who himself was sexually involved with the child molester retains his post and, yes, the favour of his fellow bishops, the Nuncio, and, in light of all the activity objecting to this recent appointment, I believe we can safely assume, the Pope.
You are right Sylvia! But isn’t it ridiculous that just the thought of needing to polygraph a member of the clergy has entered the conversation. Sure brings the bottom of the barrel within sight…
It is sad, very disappointing and really confusing how they have given up on the Faith…and everything good that should come with it.
What will fill that vacuum that they leave in their wake?
I’m still holding out hope that the Pope will stop the appointment at the last minute. He certainly has that power, and while his words say he has zero tolerance this action speaks louder than that. It is such a slap in the face to these men who have worked so hard to bring truth to light.
I hope it happens, but unfortunately its now the 11th hour, and I fear that with the Nuncio and bishops rallyng around him he will remain a bishop and, come Saturday, will officially become the Bishop of Osorno. I would dearly love to be wrong.
This is the statement of the victims regarding the installation of Bishop Juan Barros, posted with permission from Juan Carlos Cruz Chellow:
Our Statement Regarding the Appointment of Bishop Barros and the Responsibility of Pope Francis
Since his election we have put all our hope in Pope Francis. We have been encouraged by his words about sexual abuse when he told bishops: “We must continue to do everything possible to eradicate the plague of child sexual abuse in the church and open a path of reconciliation and healing for those who have suffered. ” Furthermore: “diocesan and superiors of congregations must verify that parishes and church institutions ensure the safety of children and vulnerable adults.”
We know that the appointment of bishops is something Pope Francis takes very seriously. However, people in Chile and throughout the world are disappointed because of the appointment of Bishop Juan Barros as head of the Diocese of Osorno, Chile. A man we know and have accused of witnessing abuse, our abuse, and therefore encouraging the perverse dynamics of power. The Chilean Bishops’ Conference, aware of the facts concerning Barros, supported him in a statement.
The Archbishop of Concepción, Fernando Chomalí, met with the Pope a few weeks ago and warned him that the Barros appointment was causing consternation in Chile, not only in the community of Osorno, but throughout the country. Pope Francis admitted to knowing the suffering of the victims of Karadima and the damage to the Chilean church. However – despite everything – the Pope, through the Nuncio in Chile, Ivo Scapolo, reconfirmed Barros without considering the facts and warnings of so many people, including priests and bishops. With pain we see that the faithful will have to accept and deal with Pope Francis’ decision. A pain and fear we know too well.
Today, priests and lay people, people of good will from all corners of Chilean society question the appointment and will not participate in the installation of this bishop.
As survivors of the abuse by Karadima, and the complicity of Bishop Barros, we are accustomed to the blows we have received from the Chilean hierarchy, but never directly from the Holy Father. It is hard to believe that it was the Pope himself who said a few days ago: “families should know that the Church makes great efforts to protect their children, who have the right to address her with confidence, because it is a safe house.”
Juan Carlos Cruz Chellew
James Hamilton Sánchez
José Andrés Murillo Urrutia
Santiago, March 19th 2015