National Post
Posted: April 22, 2010, 6:00 AM by Daniel Kaszor
Ontario has announced plans to implement a controversial new sex-ed program in schools. Here is Gary Clement’s take:
Comments
Ontario has announced plans to implement a controversial new sex-ed program in schools. Here is Gary Clement’s take:
Your message was successfully sent.
Thank You!
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
8:27 AM
Does the proposed curriculum include the truth that homosexual behaviour removes the choice to monogamously reproduce?
Does it explain that the removal of the choice to reproduce is logically less than equal to having the choice?
Does it acknowlege that it is a parents responsibility to help their children discriminate against lesser than equal behaviours?
This curriculum is the culmination of the liberal agenda.
They have realized that adults will no longer tolerate their lies and have chosen to lie to our children through the school system instead.
They have no demonstration of truth for their curriculum that tells our tiny children that they may be trans gendered, look like one sex on the outside but really be another on the inside. It is an opinion.
Who are they to make such an unsubstantiated claim to our children?
Does the curriculum include the fact that the American Psychiatric Association recognizes Gender Identity Disorder as a disorder to be treated by medical professionals?
The last time I protested at Queens Park it was against the Liberal inspired anti-democratic coalition.
This time I’ll be there to protest the liberal plan to lie (teach untruths) to our children in the school system.
www.StopCorruptingChildren.ca
9:58 AM
They are not going to show porn films to children.
Parents can opt their children out.
It seems their are many that don’t like it and want to impose their distaste on everyone else.
10:18 AM
The problem is parents only get an outline of what their kids are going to learn and if they’re not sure about whether it’s necessary and appropriate, the only thing they can do is remove their children.
Parents might be uncomfortable with some aspects of sex ed because we don’t want to think about our children/adolescents as sexual beings, but I think we’re more uncomfortable with the political and social engineering motives and agendas that are (arguably to be sure) at the heart of some of the curricula.
10:21 AM
I don’t veiw a negative option as acceptable here.
Once more the majority is being bent over for the ‘self-esteem’ of a minority.
10:37 AM
It can be confusing and maybe even scary for a kid to have sexual feelings toward a member of the same sex, and it does happen. A graduate of sleepaway camp that I know and trust completely told me that 8-10 year-old girls were routinely dry-humping each other in their bunk. So there are thoughts, feelings and behaviors that need to be addressed and discussed, whether we like it or not. The trick is figuring out how to do it without advocating exploration when they’re not emotionally, intellectually and psychologically equipped to do so or making them feel ashamed, embarrassed or frightened.
The highly (and inappropriately) sexualized culture in which our children are growing up are provoking and stimulating thoughts and feelings that are normal but that do not need to be acted upon if kids have the tools and guidance to know how to manage them.
I would want to know more about how the proposed curriculum is going to address the foregoing because I feel that’s where the emphasis needs to be, especially for younger kids and those just going into puberty.
So again, I suggest more of a partnership between parents and schools to provide these tools to our kids. Sex ed as a community resource, if you will.
10:38 AM
10:39 AM
531 days until Election Day!
Ontario will go to the polls on
Thursday, October 6, 2011.
10:42 AM
10:49 AM