Civil & Criminal action

Court Documents related to clerical sex abuse allegations

CANADA

Aldea: Father Pedro Aldea

28 October 2005:  Between Her Majesty the Queen Pedro Surtida Aldea: Oral Sentencing

Allen: Father Richard Allen

2004:  Reasons for judgment as to Costs

14 July 2004: P.D. v Allen Reasons for Judgement

30 August 2004: PD v Richard Allen

Antle:  Father Aloysius Antle

04 October 1991:  R. v. Aloysius Antle

Barry:  Brother Gerard Kevin Barry

25 January 2001:  Gerard Kevin Barry v Her Majesty the Queen (Reasons for Judgment  - Newfoundland Court of Appeal – appeal of conviction and sentence denied)

Bennett:  Father Kevin Bennett

25 March 2004:  John Doe v. Bennett (Supreme Court of Canada)

28 May 1990:    R. v. Bennett Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Kevin Joseph Bennett

Cooper:  Father Ian Cooper

24 January 1994:  R. v. Ian Cooper

Crampton:  Father Dale Crampton

1987:  R. v. Crampton (1987 Supreme Court of Ontario, Court of Appeal)

English:  Brother Edward P. English

20 July 1994:  R v English Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal

Fallona:  Father Michael Fallona

20 April 2011: Reasons for Judgement: K.M.M. v. The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corp., 2011 ONSC 2143

15 February 2011: BMB and Fallona, Quinlan et al (redacted) (Ontario Superior Court of Justice between B.M.B and Fallona, Quinlan, et al. B.M.b. is Brenda Brunelle)

22 October 2010: Affidavit of Paul Ledroit (Fallona)

22 October 2010: Notice of Motion (Fallona)

25 November 2009: Statement of Claim to Michael Fallona, Christopher Quinlan, The Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of London in Ontario, Bishop Ronald Peter Fabbro and The Congregation of St. Basil

19 July 2009: Basilian Justice Advocate for Canada and Northern United States: CONFIDENTIAL REPORT: To Fr. Gordon Judd csb, Vicar General

Glendinning:  Barry Glendinning

02 February 2004:  Reasons for Judgement (Glendinning lawsuit) (Barry Glendinning)

Grecco:  Donald Grecco

20 September 2010:  Michael Blum Statement of Claim (Donald Grecco)

Hart:  Father Brian Hart

31 August 2010: Hart v. Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of the Diocese of Kingston, in Canada, 2010 ONSC 4709 (CanLII)

Hickey: Father James Hickey

21 September 2011:  John Doe vs Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation of St. John’s 2011

MacEachern:  Father Malcolm MacEachern (later Bishop Malcolm MacEachern)

01 December 2010:   John Carson MacKenzie Statement of Claim re Malcolm MacEachern

Marshall: Father William Hodgson Marshall csb

17 November 2011: Jerry Boyle Statement of Claim

19 August 2011: John Doe Statement of Claim )

08 June 2011: Thomas Haberer: Victim Impact Statement 

08 June 2011: Beverly McMahon: Victim Impact Statement

08 June 2011: Robert J. C. McMahon: Victim Impact Statement

08 June 2011: “A”: Victim Impact Statement (William Hodgson Marshall csb)

08 June 2011: Jerry Boyle: Victim Impact Statement (William Hodgson Marshall csb)

08 June 2011: Patrick McMahon: Victim Impact Statement (William Hodgson Marshall csb)

Mombourquette:  Father James Mombourquette

02 November 1995: F.W.M. v. James Mombourquette and Roman Catholic & Episcopal Corporation of Antigonish

02 November 1995: M. (F.W.) v. Mombourquette

Mount Cashel

18 December 1975:   Homosexual acts and child abuse at Mount Cashel Orphanage

Morrissey: Robert Morrissey

11 February 1993: R. v. Morrissey: Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Robert Morrissey, Accused

O’Connor:  Bishop Hubert Patrick O’Connor

26 March 1997: Regina v. Hubert Patrick O’Connor (Court of Appeal for British Columbia: Oral Reasons for Judgment – bail granted) Justices Carrothers, Goldie and MacFarlane)

16 September 1996: R. v. O’Connor, 1996 CanLII 8393 (BC CA) Court of Appeal for British Columbia – application for release denied) Madame Justice Proudfoot

13 September 1996: R v O’Connor 1996 (Supreme Court of British Columbia – Sentencing – 21/2 years and 3 months to run concurrently ) Justice Oppal

06 December 1996: Regina v. Hubert Patrick O’Connor (Court of Appeal for British Columbia ‘- appeal re bail not frivolous – order to review) Chief Justice McEachern

1995: R.v. O’Connor: Hubert Patrick O’Connor v. Her Majesty The Queen (Interveners: The Attorney general of Canada, the Attorney general of Ontario, the Aboriginal Women’s Council, the Canadian Association of Sexual Assault Centres, the Disabled Women’s Network of Canada, the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund, the Canadian Mental Health Association and the Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law) (Supreme Court of Canada – Appealing BC Court of Appeal decision ordering a new trial – Appeal dismissed) Justices Lamer C.J., La Forest, L’Heureux-Dubé, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ. Justices Lamer and Sopinka and Justice Major dissenting

30 March 1994: Regina v Hubert Patrick O’Connor and (Intervenors) Attorney General of Canada; Canadian Mental Health Association; and Aboriginal Women’s Council; Canadain Association of Sexual Assault Centres; DAWN Canada (Disabled Women’s Network Canada), and Women’s Legal Education Action Fund (Court of Appeal for British Columbia – Reasons for Judgment of the Court – allowed the appeal, set aside the stay and directed that a new trial be held) Justices Taylor, Wood, Hollinrake, and Madam Justices Rowles and Prowse.

03 March 1993: Regina v. Hubert Patrick O’Connor (Court of Appeal for British Columbia – Oral Reasons for Judgment – application for leave for Crown “to adduce new evidence on the hearing of an appeal against the entry of a judicial stay of proceedings during the course of the trial…”‘ appeal to be heard 15 & 16 September 1993.) Justices Wood, Hollinrake and Taylor

24 November 1992: Regina v. Hubert Patrick O’Connor (Supreme Court of British Columbia – Reasons for Judgment – Apllication to quash dismissed) Justice Thackery

22 October 1992: Regina v. Hubert Patrick O’Connor (Supreme Court of British Columbia – Reasons for Judgment – re application for stay “The case must be ‘left to take its course and to be dealt with by the Court on the evidence’”) Justice Allan D. Thackray

Picot:  Father Charles Picot

18 August 2011:  R v. Picot, 2011 NBCA 70 (English begins on p. 39)   

Prince: Monsignor Bernard Prince

09 October 2009:  Pembroke Diocese Statement of Defence and Crossclaim against Bernard Prince

30 March 2010:  Barry Conway Affidavit re Monsignor Bernard Prince sex abuse

10 February 1993:  Pembroke’s Bishop Windle letter to Papal Nuncio re Father  Bernard Prince  expressing concerns that Prince’s sexual abuse of several young boys might become public knowledge.

15 August 1990:  Unsigned letter on Pembroke Diocese letter head.  (Appears it may be letter which Pembroke Bishop Windle claimed he sent to those Bishops in whose jurisdiction Monsignor Bernard Prince had served in some capacity at some point in time) 

Richard: Father Clair Richard

20 July 1992: R. v. Richards (Sentencing)

___________________________

USA

Kansas

05 April 2012:  State of Missouri, Plaintiff vs Robert W Finn et al Defendants 05 April 2012

06 October 2011:06 October 2011 Complaint for Declaratory Relief to Compel Arbitration over Breach of Contract (complaint filed against The Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph and Bishop Robert Finn)

31 August 2011:   The Graves Report:  Report of Independent Investigation re Father Ratigan (Kansas)

SNAP ( Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests)

02 March 2012:   Transcript of Videotaped Deposition of SNAP Executive Director David Clohessy

 

 

Comments are closed.