Keep an eye on French CBC TV tomorrow (Friday 18 May 2012). There is a strong possibility of news on Bishop James Wingle. I don’t know what time. If anyone catches anything please pass on the word.
Enough for now,
Sylvia
Keep an eye on French CBC TV tomorrow (Friday 18 May 2012). There is a strong possibility of news on Bishop James Wingle. I don’t know what time. If anyone catches anything please pass on the word.
Enough for now,
Sylvia
There is some confusion as to what exactly has happened to Bishop Raymond Lahey . We are told that Lahey has “been dismissed form the clerical state.”
We laity are more familiar with the terms “laicized” or “defrocked,” and I think it’s fair to say that most everyone understands exactly what “defrocked” means.
So, I have been going through several books on the Code of Canon Law with commentaries, and here is what I have found:
- The word “laicization” is rarely used now. It is deemed derogatory to the laity. But, the truth is that Bishop Raymond Lahey has been laicized, in other words, he has been ‘defrocked.”
- Lahey becomes in the eyes of the Church and for legal effects a layman.
- Lahey is not permitted to wear clerical garb
- Lahey can not use the title Father or Reverend
- Lahey can no longer claim financial support from the Church (if he truly indigent his bishop would see that he is taken care of)
- Lahey can not belong to any clerical associations
- Lahey can no longer function as a priest. (as in the cases of all ex-priests he could give absolution to a penitent who is in danger of death)
- Lahey loses all positions, offices and functions related to the clerical state
- Lahey is freed from all clerical obligations except that of celibacy (he will however be required to pray the Liturgy of the hours in reparation for the harm and scandal he has caused and for the sanctification of clergy)
- Lahey is bound by all duties incumbent upon the laity
Adam commented on the blog that Lahey will be excommunicated if he violates the imposed canonical penalties imposed. I can find nothing to that effect and would like to see which canon in the Code such a penalty falls. I can see it happening if he were to marry, but wonder about it in regard to his praying the Liturgy of the Hours. Can anyone provide the applicable canon? I will pursue this privately but will be unable to do so until later in the day.
*****
A reminder here that, there is other Lahey business which needs fixing:
(1) Introductory letter in Believe in me
while he was Bishop of St. George’s Diocese in Newfoundland, Lahey penned the introductory letter in the Grade 7 religion book Believe in me, part of the CCCB religion program called We are Strong Together. In March 2010, at the request of the CCCB, the Lahey text was obliterated from the texts in many – but not all – school boards. I would hope ALL school boards, including the Ottawa Catholic School Board and the Catholic District School Board of Easter Ontario, will now ensure that the Lahey letter is obliterated.
(2) CBW III
Lahey also has a letter in the Catholic Book of Worship III. The letter should be obliterated, as should all liturgical ditties which Lahey composed.
(3) The plaque in Corner Brook, Newfoundland
And then there is the matter of the plaque bearing the name of the “Most Rev. Raymond J. Lahey” on the ceremonial cornerstone of the former Regina High School in Corner Brook Newfoundlandwhich is about to become a junior high school. It really must go!
*****
Has anyone heard what happened in court yesterday re Father Rheal LeBlanc?
LeBlanc is also facing charges of possession of child porn. I am sure his knees are knocking right now.
Enough for now,
Sylvia
”Bishop” Raymond Lahey has been defrocked. He is now Mr. Raymond Lahey.
That was fast. Let’s hope this is a sign of things to come.
Global News
Wednesday, May 16, 2012 1:43 PM
The Canadian Press,
ANTIGONISH, N.S. – A Roman Catholic bishop who was convicted of importing child pornography into Canada has been stripped of his clerical duties.
The Diocese of Antigonish, N.S., says the Holy See in Rome has dismissed Raymond Lahey from the clerical state.
The diocese says that is one of the most serious penalties that the Roman Catholic Church can impose.
In a statement, the diocese says that means Lahey can no longer preside at any religious services or sacraments.
Lahey was sentenced earlier this year to 15 months in jail after he was caught with hundreds of pornographic photos of young boys at the Ottawa airport.
A court date for Holy Cross Father Rheal LeBlanc this morning (16 May 2012): 9 am, Welland courthouse (102 East Main Street), Welland Ontario.
Please pass on news of the outcome and/or links to any media coverage.
*****
Father Rene Labelle’s next court date is 05 June, 2012: 09:30 am, Kingston Ontario courthouse (279 Wellington St.) , court room #1
I will check this morning to see what this scheduled appearance is for.
*****
Keep an eye on NEW to the site for links to newly-posted articles, documents and videos (access the page manually by clicking the “NEW” tab on the horizontal menu under the picture.
Enough for now,
Sylvia
A court date for Father Rene Labelle this morning: 9 am, Kingston Ontario courthouse (279 Wellington St.).
Please, as always, keep the complainants in your prayers, and please pass on any information you might have regarding the outcome.
*****
Note that according to the following article the 74+ charges against former-fugitive-Belgian-born-Oblate priest Father Eric Dejager include the following:
one of unlawful confinement;
one of uttering threats; and
three counts of use of violence to prevent reporting of suspicious activity
14 May 2012: More charges brought forward against Dejaeger
I will check to see what coverage there is today which is new.
PS: I will tack this one in here:
14 May 2012: One more charge against Dejaeger likely: Crown
It looks as though there are indeed 77 charges in Nunavut with the possibility of one more.
(Lest we forget, there is also one charge of bestiality)
Enough for now,
Sylvia
An 11th hour guilty plea from ex-priest Albert LeBlanc:
14 May 2012: Ex-priest pleads guilty to indecent assault
14 May 2012: Former priest pleads guilty to indecent assault
Six guilty pleas actually: one guilty plea for each of his 6 victims.
Only six guilty pleas for 50 charges!
It has taken LeBlanc 16 months to fess up to those six charges. I suppose that’s the way “the system” works, but I will never understand it. It seems to me that if you did it you did it, and you know full well that you did it. Why months on end to figure it out? Those are months on end that victims are often treated like good-for-nothing liars. As far as I’m concerned, it’s another wave of victimization for the victims.
Without doubt, as is usually the norm, LeBlanc will be given kudos at sentencing for the guilty pleas, and a pat on the back for sparing his victims the rigours of testifying.
I just don’t understand how they can do it and get away with it.
And, what of the other 44 charges? There must have been a deal to let those go in exchange for a plea guilty on six? If those other 44 charges weren’t dealt with at trial today then that’s it.
Anyway, I am happy for the victims. You came forward. It was hard. But, thanks to you, now we all know what Father Albert LeBlanc was all about. He is a criminal.
LeBlanc’s sentencing hearing is set for 17 August 2012.
*****
And, from Iqaluit, Nunavut, word that Father Eric Dejager was in court this morning and will be back will be 16 July 2012:
14 May 2012: Nunavut priest makes brief court appearance on 77 criminal charges.
14 May 2012: Priest facing 74 charges waives preliminary hearing
I see that one report indicates he is now facing 77 charges, and another puts the numbers at the 74 we had previously heard. I will see what comes of the numbers in the media coverage tomorrow. If there is still confusion I will get it sorted out.
Note that it seems there is the possibility of at least one, if not not more complainants which would also mean more charges. The RCMP investigation is ongoing.
Dejaeger has waved his right to a preliminary hearing. I see no mention that he has waived his Charter right to a speedy trial. I would hope that he would be obliged to and would agree waive the latter right: it would be heartbreaking for all, not to mention a terrible travesty of justice, if he managed to get off on the argument that his Charter right to a speedy trial has been violated.
The earliest we can hope to see a trial is Spring 2013. It is anticipated the trial will take at least a month.
Meanwhile Dejaeger’s preliminary hearing on his Edmonton, Alberta charges is scheduled for 21&22 December of this year. (I wonder why he chose not to waive that one?)
Enough for now.
Sylvia
A busy week in the offing in court:
(1) Monday 14 May to Friday 18 May 2012
Ex-priest Albert Leblanc sex abuse TRIAL: Yarmouth, Nova Scotia courthouse. The courtroom is booked for the week.
Please keep these complainants in your prayers in a special way this week. They will be called to testify. It will be a difficult week for both the complainants and their families. In many if not most cases the family know little of the nature of the allegations until they hear them at trial. My thoughts and prayers are with you all.
I encourage those in the Yarmouth area who are free to do so to please attend. As always, I ask that you send along any information which can be passed along or links to media coverage at the end the end of each day of the trial.
(2) Monday 14 May 2012
Father Eric Dejaeger omi: Iqaluit courthouse, Iqaluit, Nunavut: to file formal indictment. We should get some idea tomorrow of the nature of the 35 new charges and how much additional time the Crown and/or defence might need/request before moving forward.
Again, keep the complainants in your prayers, both those in Nunavut and those in Edmonton, Alberta. They will all I am sure be anxiously awaiting any news at all on the outcome of tomorrow’s hearing;
(3) Tuesday 15 April 2012
Father Rene Labelle: 9 am, Kingston, Ontario Ontario courthouse (247 Wellington St.).
If there is anyone in the Kingston area who is free to pop into the courthouse to find out what happens on Tuesday please do. These early ‘revolving’ door court dates are difficult for all. So often it is no more than a rescheduling to another date, but, sometimes things happen which are of interest. The only for sure is that it will be months before a trial is set.
Again, keep the complainants in your prayers, and please pass along any news of the outcome of the proceedings.
(4) Wednesday 16 April 2012
Holy Cross Father Rheal Leblanc: 9 am, Welland courthouse, Welland, Ontario (102 East Main Street) (child porn charges)
If anyone can attend please do so, Again, this may be another adjournment so be prepared.
*****
The Cap-Pele plebiscite was scheduled to be held tomorrow. As we all know, the “good” news here is that a plebiscite is no longer necessary: The sign bearing the name of clerical molester Father Camille Leger was torn down from the hockey arena 12 March 2012 and the arena has been re-named:)
*****
Our abdicating Bishop James Wingle was recently sighted in the Renfrew area. The word I have received is that he was offering Mass for the Golden anniversary of a family member.
Enough for now,
Sylvia
For Mother’s Day, a poem which I have posted in the past at Christmas. I thought of it as I sat down to blog. It’s about the faith and devotion of a little Irish mother long long ago, and the “trimmins” of the Rosary -the trimmins being an abbreviation for “trimmings” – referring to prayers which were frequently tacked onto the end of the Rosary, for ailing friends and so on. As I said when I posted it before, many of you Roman Catholics would have grown up with the evening family Rosary, and probably the trimmings too. As a convert it’s not a part of my past, but I have many friends who fondly recall being rounded up each evening to say the Rosary …..and, yes, the trimmins too.
So here it is, The Trimmins of the Rosary, by Father Patrick Joseph Hartigan who was, apparently, Australian of Irish descent.
Trimmins Of The Rosary
Ah, the memories that find me now my hair is turning gray,
Drifting in like painted butterflies from paddocks far away;
Dripping dainty wings in fancy-and the pictures, fading fast,
Stand again in rose and purple in the album of the past.
There’s the old slab dwelling dreaming by the wistful, watchful trees,
Where the coolabahs are listening to the stories of the breeze;
There’s a homely welcome beaming from its big, bright friendly eyes,
With the Sugarloaf behind it blackened in against the skies;
There’s the same dear happy circle round the boree’s cheery blaze
With a little Irish Mother telling tales of other days.
She had one sweet, holy custom which I never can forget,
And a gentle benediction crowns her memory for it yet;
I can see that little mother still and hear her as she pleads,
“Now it’s getting on to bed-time; all you childer get your beads.”
There were no steel-bound conventions in that old slab dwelling free;
Only this -each night she lined us up to say the Rosary;
E’en the stranger there, who stayed the night upon his journey, knew
He must join the little circle, ay, and take his decade too.
I believe she darkly plotted, when a sinner hove in sight
Who was known to say no prayer at all, to make him stay the night.
Then we’d softly gather round her, and we’d speak in accents low,
And pray like Sainted Dominic so many years ago;
And the little Irish mother’s face was radiant, for she knew
That “where two or three are gathered” He is gathered with them too.
O’er the paters and the aves how her reverent head would bend!
How she’d kiss the cross devoutly when she counted to the end!
And the visitor would rise at once, and brush his knees-and then
He’d look very, very foolish as he took the boards again.
She had other prayers to keep him. They were long, long prayers in truth;
And we used to call them “Trimmins” in my disrespectful youth.
She would pray for kith and kin, and all the friends she’d ever known,
Yes, and everyone of us could boast a “trimmin’” all his own.
She would pray for all our little needs, and every shade of care
That might darken o’er The Sugarloaf, she’d meet it with a prayer.
She would pray for this one’s “sore complaint,’ or that one’s “hurled hand,”
Or that someone else might make a deal and get “that bit of land”;
Or that Dad might sell the cattle well, and season’s good might rule,
So that little John, the weakly one, might go away to school.
There were trimmin’s, too, that came and went but ne’er she closed without
Adding one for something special “none of you must speak about.”
Gentle was that little mother, and her wit would sparkle free,
But she’d murder him who looked around while at the Rosary:
And if perchance you lost your beads, disaster waited you,
For the only one she’d pardon was “himself”-because she knew
He was hopeless, and ’twas sinful what excuses he’d invent,
So she let him have his fingers, and he cracked them as he went,
And, bedad, he wasn’t certain if he’d counted five or ten,
Yet he’d face the crisis bravely, and would start around again;
But she tallied all the decades, and she’d block him on the spot,
With a “Glory, Daddah, Glory!” and he’d “Glory” like a shot.
She would portion out the decades to the company at large;
But when she reached the trimmin’s she would put herself in charge;
And it oft was cause for wonder how she never once forgot,
But could keep them in their order till she went right through the lot.
For that little Irish mother’s prayers embraced the country wide;
If a neighbour met with trouble, or was taken ill, or died,
We could count upon a trimmin’-till, in fact, it got that way
That the Rosary was but trimmin’s to the trimmin’s we would say.
Then “himself” would start keownrawning-for the public good, we thought-
“Sure you’ll have us here till mornin’. Yerra, cut them trimmin’s short!”
But she’d take him very gently, till he softened by degrees-
“Well, then, let us get it over. Come now, all hands to their knees.”
So the little Irish mother kept her trimmin’s to the last,
Ever growing as the shadows o’er the old selection passed;
And she lit our drab existence with her simple faith and love,
And I know the angels lingered near to bear her prayers above,
For her children trod the path she trod, nor did they later spurn
To impress her wholesome maxims on their children in their turn.
Ay, and every “sore complaint” came right, and every “hurled hand”;
And we made a deal from time to time, and got “that bit of land”;
And Dad did sell the cattle well; and little John, her pride,
Was he who said the Mass in black the morning that she died;
So her gentle spirit triumphed-for ’twas this, without a doubt,
Was the very special trimmin’ that she kept so dark about.
But the years have crowded past us, and the fledglings all have flown,
And the nest beneath The Sugarloaf no longer is their own;
For a hand has written “finis” and the book is closed for good-
There’s a stately red-tiled mansion where the old slab dwelling stood;
There the stranger has her “evenings,” and the formal supper’s spread,
But I wonder has she “trimmin’s” now, or is the Rosary said?
Ah, those little Irish mothers passing from us one by one!
Who will write the noble story of the good that they have done ?
All their children may be scattered, and their fortunes windwards hurled,
But the Trimmin’s on the Rosary will bless them round the world.
Happy Mother’s Day!
Sylvia
Father Daniel Miller‘s court-date of today (09 May 2012) has been rescheduled to 13 June 2012, 09:30 am, Renfrew court-house.
I had the good fortune to be given a lift to Renfrew and was able to sit in on the proceedings. Those who have been to proceedings such as this know what it is like. There is a roster of cases, a packed courtroom, and one by one the name of each accused is called out (in alphabetical order). In some instances the accused is present in the courtroom, in many cases they are not. In most instances the order of the day was to quickly set a new court-date agreeable to all.
The courtroom is large. There are no microphones. Things move along very quickly. It is very easy to miss what is happening, and sometimes difficult to hear what is said.
Here is my understanding of events as they relate to Father Daniel Miller.
When Miller’s name was called, a lawyer identifying herself as appearing on behalf of Mr. Carew rose. I am quite certain that that is Mr. Robert Carew, the lawyer who so ably defended Monsignor Robert Borne and managed to ensure that that convicted clerical predator will serve no more than a paltry nine month conditional sentence. Carew is also the lawyer who has objected to the release to me of certain exhibits which were publicly and without mention of publication ban entered into evidence at the Borne sentencing hearing.
I don’t know why Carew is now dealing with the Miller charges. In previous court proceedings Miller was represented by either Kimberly A Pegg or Dominique Smith. Perhaps Carew, a sole practitioner, has been retained by Kimberley A. Pegg? That is highly possible. No matter, and for whatever reason, today a lawyer appeared in court on Carew’s behalf to represent Father Daniel Miller.
Father Miller was not in court.
An agreement was quickly/instantly reached between lawyer and judge to reschedule to 13 June 2012. According to the lawyer this was necessary to review about 1,500 pages of documents disclosed to defence. There was also mention made of further charges. I truly don’t know if this means that further charges are pending, or if it was reference to the new set of charges laid 13 April 2012. It could well be the latter. I will try to find out, but no guarantees I will get answers.
So, there it is. All over in the twinkle of an eye.
I wouldn’t say it was a wasted trip. It is always interesting to see how the the wheels of justice grind ever so slowly along. And it is always interesting to see one case after the other set over to another day. And, yes, of course, it was very interesting to learn that Mr. Carew is now involved.
And all of that aside, I had a beautiful lunch served up courtesy of an amazing and very dear 85-year-old lady.
Not a wasted day at all
Enough for now,
Sylvia