So he was charged in September 2007 and he is only now getting to trial no freakin wonder they get freed on time requirements. When will the courts take this seriously and get these trials started sooner. 

what justice, I wouldn't hold too much faith in reading what you are looking for in here. It appears that no matter what Osprey writes everyone accuses them of misprinting.

dodger I bet they take it more serious then we think. The major problem is all the special interest groups and issues that come into play. I am not siding with the system at all, but I do know people in it. There are so many policies and procedures that it really takes that long to come to trial. You can thank systems and processes like the charter of rights for these policies and procedures.Personally I think a lead injection is better then sentencing, but apparently that is not fair either. 

Re: Issue B) Please explain the relevance of you knowing people in “the system”. Is this supposed to give credibility to your assertions? Name the names of the “public officials, civil servants”, who have convinced you to believe what you assert.

I mean, I can easily say I know a multitude of people “in the system”, who believe as I do, which is contrary to what you assert. Ask any of your cronies or other friends who know me; they will tell you if they think I know anyone “in the system” and “how high up and wide across”. But, does that really mean anything…who we know?

I ask you, “Itinerant”, do you now or have you ever worked “in the system”, in the context you present here and do you have specific education, expertise, experience and knowledge about the “rules”, “regulations”, “time constraints”, “case management expectations”, “policies”, “protocols” etc.? Or, as I suspect, are you “blindly” relying on the “excuses”, “rationalizations”, “justifications” and “hearsay” of some possibly lazy, incompetent, or corrupt public servants or “assistants”, you meet at the “food court” in “The Square”?

I suggest you are an ignorant and naïve, “wanna-be”, “straw man, surrogate” for some of these public servants and you are spreading inaccurate and misleading information, for whatever reason…..
Re: Issue C) Again, your information is an example of how ignorant and naïve you are and how you have been “misled”. Or, perhaps your comments are simply, a further example of your deliberate attempt to mislead other readers.

I implore you to name or reference some of the “policies” and “procedures” that “cause” it to, “take that long to come to trial.” May I be so bold as to suggest, that the rules, regulations, policies, procedures, time constraints, case management procedures, etc., etc. are readily available and accessible on the internet, for any reader to read and study. FURTHERMORE, the “foundation” so-to-speak; i.e.) rules, regulations, merit, expectations, time constraints, policies, procedure, case management protocol, etc., etc., for “timely” prosecution, among other things, are clearly defined and known by ALL lawyers and Justice in general. May I be so bold as to suggest, that it is my belief and understanding, that for various reasons, lawyers and other justice officials, their agents, representatives and court officials, arbitrarily and/or together, decide, when to “delay”, “retard the process” or basically when to use their power to “circumvent” “due process” and the existing rules, regulations, etc., as written above. So maybe “the practice” in some cases has been as you suggest, but that does not mean that the rules, laws, regulations, protocols, policies, etc., etc., were properly followed, in good faith and in the “interest of justice”.

Boy, isn’t this a lot of “power”, in the hands of some lawyers and other Justice Officials? My, my, my, to be able to “practice” at will, disregarding and circumventing “Justice”. MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT; there exist laws, yes LAWS, to defeat the attempts to dismiss prosecutions on the merit that is has taken too long to bring to trial. THERE are laws that “toll/stop” any time limitations. Read previous “S-F” letters to the editor. In or about 1998 I wrote about some of those laws and I also, predicted, what would happen and eventually did.
MAKE NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT; NONE of the prosecutions should have been dismissed for delay in prosecution, otherwise and/or equivalent. Furthermore, “the system” knows it all too well. So, “Itinerant”, as you have now done for over a year, stop spreading misinformation and hearsay. You I believe, are a very dangerous person “disseminating” misinformation.

Get the facts straight. Stop spreading the “hearsay” and misinformation you picked up at the picnic table beside “Tim’s” on Brookdale……get the picture!! 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #7 By JAMES "SPEAK OUT",