Home
Cover-up
Garry Guzzo
Institutions
Leduc Trial
Media
Of Interest
Perry Dunlop
Questions
Red Flags
The AG
The Clan
The Diocese
The Inquiry
The Scandal
The Trials
The Victims
cornwall

the inquiry


Cornwall Public Inquiry

Perry Dunlop Email Letter

to the Justice of the Ontario Divisional Court. 

The letter was sent by email and received at Ontario Divisional Court 19 November 2007  On that same day Justice Glaude, through his lawyer, urged his judicial colleagues to charge Perry with contempt of court.  The Justices complied.  Perry was found guilty.

November 18, 2007

   

       

To the Panel of the Divisional Court regarding:

 

Commissioner Glaude/Cornwall Public Inquiry vs Perry Dunlop.

 

  

  

I received notice from the Applicant in this matter on Thursday, November 15, 2007.

 

I have read the Factum of the Applicant, Commissioner Normand Glaude.

 

It is despicable and pathetic at best in its’ half truths.

 

I want to state for the record, the following comments/facts;

 

Since September 1993, I have been treated/called a villain, pariah, rogue, self serving zealot, anti-christ, egotist, derelict cop and worse.

 

As a police officer in late September of that year, I discovered an illegal pay-off of criminal activity within my police force/community. Namely, the cover-up/pay off of child sexual abuse by high profile members of my police force, catholic church and community.

 

Under provincial statute, I followed the law and reported my suspicions.

 

I have paid a heavy price for protecting children under my care as both a police office, a father and a member of the community.

 

I do not regret my actions, only that I trusted the judicial system to act in public’s best interests.

 

Many years later, I find myself and my family, still embroiled in the same nightmare.

 

Now they want my head.

 

In early 2005, Dalton McGuinty’s government called for a  provincial Inquiry into this sorid affair.

 

They never consulted the very victims this Inquiry was to affect.

 

The Ontario government and the Attorney General’s Office had it’s own agenda.

 

That agenda has become very clear,.... protect pedophiles and their supporters at any cost.

 

There is much to lose.

 

I have never been far from their sights.

 

Their aim has always been...........”Shoot the Messenger”.

 

I have been lied to, deceived, coerced, bullied and threatened by the Cornwall Inquiry and those who work for them.

 

Millions of the Ontario taxpayers dollars have been spent to lie, deny, cover-up and minimize the truth surrounding the atrocities of historical and present day child sexual abuse in the Cornwall region. I became aware of the injustices in late 1993, but the horror dated back many decades and involved many high ranking and influential doctors, lawyers, political figures, policeman and other prominent citizens.

 

I was subpeoned under duress and false pretense to attend the Inquiry in September and October of this year. I fought the summonses after the fact, but to no avail.

 

The Commissioner and his legal counsel lied to me on no less than 3 occasions when they stated that “ no one would be compelled to testify”. (Please avail yourselves to the numerous allocations of Commissioner Glaude’s comments to this fact in the Cornwall Inquiry transcripts since April 1995). There are also at least 2 letters from Mr. Engelmann on the record  attesting to this fact.

 

Since I attended Cornwall in October 2007, it has become abundantly clear that the Commissioner and his advisors have no regard for my personal or constitutional rights.

I have been treated with hostility and judicial predjudice since day one.

 

One of the cornerstones of our judicial system is the right of client / solicitor privilege.

 

Commissioner Glaude has thrown that Right, out the window on a number of occasions.

 

One has only to read the transcripts from Charles Bourgeois’s testimony and last weeks transcripts to garner proof. My constitutional rights were trampled on without any notice given to me what so ever. In fact, the Commissioner’s counsel told my ex lawyer, Charles Bourgeois, not to contact me prior to his appearance before the Inquiry.

 

Any reasonable person would conclude that I have not been treated fairly

.

Canadians that I have spoken to are outraged that our judicial system has treated me in such a disrespectful and cavalier manner.

 

As a final point, it is interesting that the Inquiry Commission and Counsel is so concerned about the money it has cost to force my wife and I to attend the hearings in Cornwall. Please understand one thing, we did not want to attend these hearings, we were ‘forced’ to attend.

   

Also, the Inquiry’s mandate is seriously flawed. This has been a concern for us and many others since day one. It continues to this day. It is well documented.

 

The Commissioner himself is in serious conflict of interest. That has been pointed out on a number of occasions, albeit , to no ones’ interest.

 

The millions of dollars being sucked from the Ontario taxpayer to pay for the Commissioner, his counsel, the Inquiry staff, the 55+ lawyers representing the various institutions, and the costs associated that we will never know about,....pale in comparison to the paltry amount they have spent on me.

 

If they had invested the money spent over the last 14 years in hunting down the perpetrators and their protectors instead of shooting the messenger, well ...just imagine how many children’s  lives would have been saved.

 

I know I will never be treated fairly at the Cornwall Public Inquiry. There is amble proof of that.

   

The cast was dyed many years ago. It continues to this very day.

 

Sirs, I have no intention of testifying at the Cornwall Inquiry now or ever.

I have told the truth, I will tell the truth and nothing will diswade me from the truth.

 

I remain, respectfully and truthfully yours,

 

Perry D. Dunlop

 
Perry Dunlop