Home
Cover-up
Garry Guzzo
Institutions
Leduc Trial
Media
Of Interest
Perry Dunlop
Questions
Red Flags
The AG
The Clan
The Diocese
The Inquiry
The Scandal
The Trials
The Victims
cornwall

the inquiry


Cornwall Public Inquiry

Institutions
CAS/Ian MacLean
Don't investigate: director

  

CORNWALL PUBLIC INQUIRY

  

Cornwall Standard Freeholder

 17 October 2008

Posted By TREVOR PRITCHARD

 

The former executive director of the Children's Aid Society twice suggested accusations of sexual abuse leveled against a foster family's son not be investigated by police, the Cornwall Public Inquiry heard Thursday.

 

Documents entered into evidence during the testimony of retired CAS supervisor Ian MacLean showed that Thomas O'Brien twice told the Crown attorney's office -first in December 1982, and then in April 1983 - that he didn't feel allegations against Brian Lapensee were serious enough to lay charges.

 

"I did not (share) those opinions," said MacLean, who spent three decades with the local CAS branch before leaving in 2006.

 

In 1982, teenage girls at the family's group home in Martintown started complaining that Lapensee, then in his early 20s, would grab their breasts while they watched television and played cards.

 

After interviewing the girls, MacLean and another caseworker compiled a report which concluded that "many if not all, and perhaps more, of these incidents did occur."

   

 Among the agency's recommendations were that Lapensee stay away from the girls at the home. However, O'Brien -who is scheduled to testify this week -also met with the Crown attorney, where he shared his view that the allegations weren't significant enough to get the police involved.

MacLean told lead commission counsel Peter Engelmann that he and the other caseworker disagreed with their boss and felt Lapensee should have been charged.

 

"And what did you do to try and see that that happened?" asked Engelmann.

 

"Well, we reported back to Mr. O'Brien. And that was the practice, apparently, at that time," said MacLean. "We did it this time, and we did it the next time as well."

 

That "next time" was in the following April, after another foster child in the home, Roberta Archambault, accused Lapensee of groping her and making unwanted sexual comments during an Easter visit.

 

After learning of the allegation, O'Brien wrote the Crown attorney's office, saying it wasn't necessary to charge Lapensee because all the girls had been placed in new homes and Lapensee's alleged sexual advances were not "too serious."

 

The CAS closed the Lapensee home a few months later.

 

In 2006, Archambault took the stand at the inquiry, which is looking at how institutions like the CAS reacted to allegations of historical sexual abuse. She testified Lapensee began abusing her three months after she arrived at the home in late 1980, and that the abuse included fondling and forced oral sex.

 

Lapensee has never been convicted of those allegations.

 

During MacLean's cross-examination, Citizens for Community Renewal lawyer Juda Strawczynski showed MacLean statements he'd given in 1994 to a Cornwall Police Service officer who was investigating an unrelated allegation of abuse at another foster home.

 

According to the officer's notes, MacLean said the agency's philosophy was still in the "closet stages" in the 1970s, when it came to investigating sexual abuse. CAS wards were considered "troubled individuals" whose allegations were not to be taken at face value, the notes said.

 

Strawczynski argued that philosophy was still in place in the 1980s when the alleged abuse in the Lapensee home came to light.

 

"What I'm going to suggest to you here, sir, is that similarly, the institution of the Children's Aid Society wished at this time to keep these things as quiet as possible," he said.

 

Not true, said MacLean: not only did O'Brien go to the Crown attorney, but he also informed his superiors in the provincial government of the allegations.

  

 "We did go outside of our agency to seek counsel. We did go outside of the agency to report abuse," said MacLean. "I did not see any effort to sweep this under the rug or keep this hidden."

MacLean's cross-examination continues this morning.

    

 Article ID# 1251281  

Comments


Don’t investigate "According to the officer's notes, MacLean said the agency's philosophy was still in the "closet stages" in the 1970s, when it came to investigating sexual abuse. CAS wards were considered "troubled individuals" whose allegations were not to be taken at face value, the notes said." The philosophy in the 70's was and is no difference than in the 50's and as far as I'm concerned, are still treated that way but the only difference being it's now 2008. If the wards weren't "troubled individuals" by the time they got into the CAS or CCAS's, I would allege that between the Societies and certain foster homes the wards were driven to being "troubled individuals" at the mercy of certain elements who really could care less one way or the other. Progress, eh? Try telling that to those kids who got screwed around by these certain elements or better yet, go to the gravesites of ALL of the kids who have been killed while in the suppossed care of these elements. Or does anybody give a rat's rectum? 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By nodegamra


"CAS wards were considered "troubled individuals" whose allegations were not to be taken at face value", Well aparently their word was good enough to get them into cas care in the 1st place, torn from their families but once something was reported from inside Cas by the children..well the children were lying then supposenly. I've seen it 1st hand and have actual documents in a workers own words when a child tried to report something to a worker that was done to them in cas care the worker called the child a lier and put that right in their notes. Shameful! 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By FreetheChildren


You hit the nail right on the head FreetheChildren a childs word is enough to get the child away from the family but not good enough to report something wrong in a foster home. These people have no accountability to anyone and only a judge can make a decision that can counter what the CAS decides. I speak from experience I have my grandchild in my custody and had to fight the CAS to get that child in my care. After spending close to 16 thousand dollars on lawyers fees a judge finally awarded us custody of our grandchild. The CAS has endless funding for their lawyers us the people fighting them either have to put up our homes or other collateral to get the funding to afford the lawyer to get the child into our custody. Do I trust any CAS worker at all yes maybe one or two because they are honestly doing their jobs and for the right reasons not just for the money.  

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #3 By dodger


Go to the CAS office on Boundary Road during a normal week day from monday to friday look at how many cars are in that parking lot. I counted 64 cars the other day. Does that tell you how busy these people are It is an industry because they make money from the misery of children and their families. Yes there are cases where the CAS should definitely be involved. But not all cases are handled properly and are bungled very badly at the expense of the family and the children.

  Reply | Report | Page Top Post #4 By dodger

Does anyone here know what a foster parent get's for fostering a child per month $$$$$. Also children with special needs those rates. If you checked you would be amazed at what kind of money is paid to foster parents for fostering.  

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #5 By dodger

The term for foster funding is called Per Diem Rates. It ranges from 37.00 / day, per child, to 100's a day if the child is "special needs" or "troubled" etc. In a recent Board meeting I attended of the Ottawa CAS it was mentioned that the funding foster parents get is not considered salary for the foster parents but is supposed to be for the child. This was brought up because a foster parent on the board wanted to be on the finance committee but was told he could not because of a conflict of interest. This is why he brought up the issue.. if I am not getting paid by CAS, but rather the money is for the child, why is it a conflict of interest for me to be on the finance committee he asked. I can't emphasize enough how important it is to join your local CAS. It is an annual fee of about 10 - 25 bucks but you get rights under the corporation's By-Laws which you can access once you are a member. If you have problems becoming a member with your local CAS contact me at http://www.afterfostercare.ca 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #6 By afterfostercare

So if i calculate this right then a normal child without special needs is on average 1110 dollars per month and a special needs childs is 3000 dollars per month. So how many children can foster parents host at one time? 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #7 By dodger

Let me see if i raise my children I get zippo if i raise foster children I get 1110 dollars per child per month. Sounds just like a business except children are involved. 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #8 By dodger,

I know of one foster parent that takes in three children at a time on average. Now are they doing it for the love of the children or for the money? You tell me! Hell i can't earn that kind of money working two jobs on an average wage in Cornwall. 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #9 By dodger,

afterfostercare thank you for the info I will be checking into the things you mentioned here. 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #10 By dodger

By the way I am not saying all foster parents are in it for the money but that many do get into it for the money! 

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #11 By dodger,