Home
Cover-up
Garry Guzzo
Institutions
Leduc Trial
Media
Of Interest
Perry Dunlop
Questions
Red Flags
The AG
The Clan
The Diocese
The Inquiry
The Scandal
The Trials
The Victims
cornwall

the inquiry


Cornwall Public Inquiry

The Diocese
Gardaí to resubmit altar boy abuse file 

     

The irishtimes.com

 

26 March 2010

  

BARRY ROCHE Southern Correspondent

 

CLOYNE: GARDAÍ ARE to resubmit a file to the DPP after re-interviewing an elderly priest in the Diocese of Cloyne concerning a complaint he sexually assaulted another priest when the younger man was an altar boy more than 20 years ago.

 

Detectives met the elderly priest earlier this week and interviewed him at length after they obtained further information from diocesan files which had been handed over by Bishop John Magee to the National Board for Safeguarding Children in the Catholic Church (NBSCC).

 

The priest, identified as Fr A in the report prepared by Ian Elliot, chief executive of the NBSCC, had previously been interviewed by gardaí in 2006 and a file had been sent to the DPP but the DPP had directed there be no prosecution.

 

However, on foot of a complaint from a retired schoolteacher that Bishop Magee had withheld information from gardaí when the diocese first reported the matter in 2005, gardaí examined a file on the matter given by the diocese to Mr Elliott for his inquiry.

 

Now on foot of examination of that file which included information not seen by officers, detectives met the elderly priest this week and interviewed him again about the complaint that he sexually assaulted the young altar boy in the mid-1980s.

 

The new information together with the memorandum of the new interview with Fr A will now be added to the Garda file on the case which will be resubmitted in the coming months to the DPP.

 

Meanwhile a file is also being assessed in relation to another priest in the Cloyne diocese, identified by Mr Elliott in his report as Fr B, a priest in his 70s, who has previously been accused by six women of sexually assaulting them while young girls.

 

All six files were submitted separately and the DPP has directed in each case that no prosecution be brought. But he is now considering a seventh case which relates to a complaint against the priest that he sexually abused a young girl over 25 years ago.

 

Two further files are also being considered separately in relation to another priest from the Cloyne diocese who stood down from his ministry last year after two women made two separate complaints to gardaí that they had been assaulted by him when aged just 13 in the early 1980s.

 

The priest, who is in his 50s, agreed to take administrative leave from his parish duties in May 2009 pending the investigation by gardaí, whom he met by appointment in September 2009 when they interviewed him for several hours about the allegations.

 Meanwhile, gardaí have also started an investigation after a woman alleged she was sexually assaulted by another priest in the Cloyne diocese in 2000, when she was aged 20. The man, who is now in his late 40s, has since left the priesthood, The Irish Times understands.
 Bishop took two years to tell Garda of sex claim 

The Irish Times - Friday, March 26, 2010

 

PATSY McGARRY Religious Affairs Correspondent

 

BISHOP OF WATERFORD AND LISMORE: CATHOLIC BISHOP of Waterford and Lismore William Lee said yesterday the Garda was not contacted by him for two years after he became aware of allegations of child sex abuse against a priest in the diocese, and that the priest was not removed from ministry for three years after he became aware of those complaints.

 

Last December he said that child protection policies in the diocese were “based on the practice of full co-operation with the statutory authorities”.

 

Yesterday, he described his own handling of the allegations of clerical child sex abuse in the diocese between 1993 and 1996 as “seriously inadequate”.

 

He admitted for the first time that he contacted the Garda about one priest in December 1995, two years after he was first made aware of complaints against the priest. He also said he did not remove the priest from ministry until February 1996.

 

Since then the priest “has not been permitted to exercise any form of ministry”.

 

Bishop Lee expressed regret yesterday “that I had not sought the immediate withdrawal of the priest from all ministry and that others associated with the new ministry were not informed that allegations had been made”.

 

The statement issued by his communications office on December 8th last referred to two priests who had allegations made against them. It said “each priest was the subject of one complaint and, after investigation by the Garda, the Director of Public Prosecutions decided not to initiate a prosecution”. It assured people in the diocese that all the bishop’s decisions “were taken after most careful deliberation including ongoing consultation with, and favourable recommendations from, the Diocesan Advisory Panel.” It also assured people “that the church’s policy of safeguarding children in Ireland is fully in place and implemented in the diocese of Waterford and Lismore” and that “the HSE considers that it enjoys a trustful and professional relationship with our diocese”.

 

Yesterday, Bishop Lee spoke of “the inadequacies” in his handling of the cases referred to.

 

Explaining his volte face when it came to contacting the Garda about the December 1993 case and eventual removal of the priest from ministry, he said that “in October 1995, having had the benefit of the guidance then emerging from the Bishops’ advisory committee on child sexual abuse, I reviewed my earlier decisions in the case and concluded that these had been seriously inadequate.”

 

He “set about initiating a full review of the case. I renewed contact with the complainants and advised them of the policy with regard to reporting such complaints to the Garda which it was anticipated would be adopted by the episcopal conference in January 1996. With their knowledge I reported their complaints to the Garda in December 1995.”

 

He arranged that the priest be reassessed at a new treatment centre. “On this occasion the advice offered led me to decide to bring about the withdrawal of the priest in question from ministry. I also appraised those associated with the new ministry that allegations had been received. Further complaints were received about the same priest in January 1996,” he said.

 

These were “immediately notified to the Garda”. The priest “has not been permitted to exercise any form of ministry since February 1996. Regular contact has been maintained with him and he is the subject of ongoing supervision.”

 Bishop Lee concluded his statement yesterday by saying: “I sincerely apologise and am deeply sorry for the inadequacies of my earlier actions in this case.”
 Priest asks bishop to move cleric accused of sex abuse 

The Irish Times - Friday, March 26, 2010

 

GEORGE JACKSON

 

STRABANE CASE: A PARISH priest said yesterday that the continued presence of another priest in his parochial house was “inappropriate”.

 

Fr Declan Boland, parish priest of Strabane, Co Tyrone, said he wants Fr John McCullagh removed from the Church of the Immaculate Conception parochial house after child sex abuse allegations made against Fr McCullagh.

 

Fr McCullagh, who was neither charged nor convicted of any sex abuse offence, was relieved of all clerical duties after he paid a private settlement of £12,000 to a woman who alleged he had sexually abused her over a 10-year period starting in 1979. In paying the woman, Fr McCullagh did so without admitting liability and he has always denied the allegation.

 

Nine years ago, after he was relieved from his clerical duties, he was transferred by the Derry Diocesan Authority to live in the Strabane parochial house. Fr Boland said he was unaware of the nature of the allegations against Fr McCullagh until the details emerged in the media last week. He has now asked the Bishop of Derry, Dr Seamus Hegarty, to have Fr McCullagh moved.

 

“I have a sense of frustration that information about Fr McCullagh was withheld from me by church authorities and I was kept in the dark about the specifics of his case and now I have to deal with a situation and with a problem that is none of my making,” said Fr Boland.

 

“I accept there was no admission of liability by Fr McCullagh but in this day and age perception is what matters. In the light of what has happened it would be inappropriate to have him here in the parochial house. I was not aware of the extent of the situation when he was moved to Strabane as I now am.

 

“The bottom line is given what has occurred, it is no longer appropriate for him to stay as it is now impossible for him to live in the parochial house here because parishioners here have expressed their concern about his continued presence. I have made it perfectly clear that Fr McCullagh’s stay in Strabane is no longer possible and I am confident that an appropriate decision will be made by the diocesan authorities.

 

“I am very worried that the image of the parish will be besmirched by this and I will address this from the altar at the weekend. I will clarify the situation for the people and give them a clear understanding of what has happened. Quite frankly in the light of recent revelations there is no way this man can remain under my roof,” he said.

 

The Bishop of Derry was not available for comment yesterday.

Cardinal Seán Brady urged to withdraw evidence in abuse court case

 From Times Online26 march 2010David Sharrock, Ireland CorrespondentThe leader of Ireland’s Catholics, Cardinal Seán Brady, has been urged to withdraw his defence in a legal battle with one of the alleged victims of a paedophile priest. The solicitor for the alleged victim of Father Brendan Smyth, a man who was 14 in 1975, said that he was “incredulous” at Cardinal Brady’s recent expressions of remorse given the primate’s defence in the legal proceedings. The man is suing Cardinal Brady in the cardinal’s capacity as Archbishop of Armagh. He says that he was an altar boy in Dundalk in the early 1970s when Smyth sexually assaulted him in church, on a children’s holiday in County Cork and during a trip to Dublin for a Wombles concert. In documents lodged in the High Court in Dublin, revealed this morning by RTÉ, the state broadcaster, the cardinal denies that the acts alleged are grounds for suing him and asks for proof that they happened. The documents also contest the man’s claims that Dr Brady is the Catholic Church’s representative in Ireland, that Smyth was his servant or agent and that the cardinal owed the man any duty of care. The alleged victim says that he suffered appalling abuse and was traumatised by the experiences. When he confided in another priest in Dundalk a church ecclesiastical court was convened to deal with the allegations. The church authorities assured the alleged victim and his father that Smyth would never be allowed near children again. The alleged victim says that 19 years later, while out of the country, he received a telephone call from his sister to tell him that Smyth was on television after finally being brought to justice. He says that as a consequence he began to drink heavily and suffer guilt for not protecting other children as well as experience nightmares about sexual abuse. In the court papers the cardinal denies calling an ecclesiastical court and giving assurances to the man and his father that Smyth would be removed from the orbit of children. While no names have been revealed, the alleged victim suing the cardinal was the same age as the boy whom the cardinal has already admitted he interviewed in 1975 about Smyth. Cardinal Brady admitted that the boy was sworn to secrecy about his allegations. In a St Patrick’s Day homily at Armagh Cathedral he described his response to the sexual abuse scandals as “hopelessly inadequate” and appealed for forgiveness and prayers. He said that he would spend the rest of Lent considering his future. Campaigners for victims of sexual abuse are demanding that he resign, having lost his moral authority. Last month, the alleged victim’s solicitor wrote to the cardinal’s lawyers, saying that the defence was compounding the grievous wrongs perpetrated against his client. He said that it should be withdrawn to give practical expression to the cardinal’s recent statements of remorse about clerical sexual abuse. In a statement today Cardinal Brady said that he wanted to "work towards a just resolution of the case... conscious of the rights of all concerned". He said that he had asked his legal representatives to engage the legal representatives of the complainant with a view to progressing the case. "As these matters are the subject of ongoing legal proceedings, and in light of the instructions I have given to my legal representatives today, it would be inappropriate for me to offer any further comment at this time," the Primate of All Ireland added.  
Bishop John Magee quits after mishandling sex abuse 

Mirror.co.uk

 

25/03/2010

 

A bishop who mishandled reports of sex abuse has quit and asked for forgiveness.

 

John Magee, 73, took little action when two of his priests were accused of abuse, a report by a Catholic church watchdog found.

 

"To those whom I have failed in any way, or through any omission of mine have made suffer, I beg forgiveness and pardon," he said in a statement.

 

The cleric, who served in Rome as personal secretary to three popes, resigned as head of the Cloyne diocese in County Cork in March 2009. Pope Benedict has taken a year to formalise it.

  Magee is the latest casualty of accusations gripping the Catholic church in Ireland that it protected child abusers for decades.
'Fr X' assaulted student priest but hierarchy took no action  

Independent.ie (Ireland)

 

 

Tuesday March 23 2010

 

By Ralph Riegel

   

SERIOUS concerns were raised almost 20 years ago about the suitability of a priest who was later at the centre of two separate sexual abuse allegations, the Irish Independent has learned.

 

The priest, who can only be named as 'Fr X' for legal reasons, was ordained despite being the subject of complaints by a fellow seminarian.

 

Cardinal Sean Brady admitted last week that he was also sued by a young woman who accused 'Fr X' of raping her in 1997. The case was only settled in January, with the woman receiving €50,000.

 

A day after being quizzed by police, 'Fr X' was suspended by Dr Brady from his ministry, banned from saying Mass, hearing confessions and having access to minors.

 

The priest was also tried in a Northern Ireland court for the sexual assault of another teenager, but was acquitted.

 

The same priest had been at the centre of a controversy in the early 1990s when complaints were made by a young fellow seminarian that he had been subjected to "bullying, threats" and a "very serious" incident of a sexual nature.

 

Despite both the seminary authorities and senior church officials, including the late Cardinal Cahal Daly, being made aware of the matter, the accused priest was subsequently assigned to an Irish parish.

 

Blackmail

 

The victim's family said last night that they remained "absolutely baffled" at how the man was ever allowed become a priest in the first place, despite the hierarchy being aware of the alleged assault.

 

"We just couldn't believe it -- he was such an unsuitable person," said a family member.

 

The young seminarian who made the complaints later suffered a mental breakdown. He has since made a full recovery.

 

However, his family said they were appalled to read accounts of the latest abuse allegations against the same man who had first targeted their relative.

 

"This guy was a sexual predator -- the most scary individual you could ever have anything to do with," said a family member.

 

At one point, the young seminarian was told by 'Fr X' that he would be killed if he brought the incident to the notice of the church authorities.

 

"We felt the idea that he could ever have been ordained was bizarre," said the victim's relative. "Unfortunately, nothing now surprises me at this stage.

 

"The assault was sexual in nature. All I want to say is that there was a very serious incident -- it was brought to the attention of the seminary authorities and all the relevant stakeholders.

 

"It was very serious -- it involved threatening behaviour, blackmail, bullying and all kinds of things like that.

 

"You had a very sensitive young man of 18 or 19 years of age -- and this other guy was in his late 20s.

 

"He definitely caused serious damage to him."

 

- Ralph Riegel

 

Irish Independent