………………………………………………….

Comments posted on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website in response to 29 February 2008 “Witness allegations tossed out”My sister was in the foster system around Cornwall in the era that Mr.Bissonnette was in foster care. She witnessed some goings on in the foster home she was in although she was never herself abused there sahe tells me there were other young girls that were abused in that home and any complaint that was made to the cas and the police was dismissed as just not being true. The CAS to this day is one of the most powerful organizations around and they have more power than the police themselves. As for them protecting children I have my doubts about that! It did not surprise me that the police and the CAS would want to suppress evidence that would shine a bad spotlight on them after all they are the government and they do not make mistakes nor do they cover anything up.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By Dodger, 12 hours ago | 2 Votes | Vote:

Isn't it interesting that those who were there to protect us and failed to do that and or failed to ensure that it was done, have such immunity for their negligence? The CAS hides behind their Privacy Laws, the Ministry of Children's and Youth who can effect change by ensuring the CAS follow the Child and Family Services Act keep their mouths shut and let the OACAS spout out their propoganda. And then we have the cops who don't want to investigate the CAS's and hide behind their PSA and effectively allow the abuse to go on. The Ministry of C&Y funds the CAS's & CCAS's but under the ACT, if there is a rogue CAS or CCAS, the Ministry can step into that CAS Board and remove or replace any or all Board members of that CAS and appoint another hand picked person or group to run that CAS. Funny how we don't hear about about the Ministry not doing their job as they're the ones who are responsible at the end of the day. As far as I'm concerned, the biggest abusers of kids today are those groups (Police, CAS's, CCAS's and the Ministry of C&Y)and they are the ones who should be charged as well but when you have the AG and Min of Public Safety & Corrections not doing anything but covering their butts, well now you've got it. The protection of kids in both the CAS & CCAS has been butchered since its inception in the 1890's and nobody wants to do anything because once the lid of "Pandora's Box" has been lifted, EVERY single government and party has been negligent in taking proper care of these kids and that is criminal but nobody in any Province of Ontario government wants to reveal or accept the blame for their part. And as far as our wonderful judiciary, crowns, cops, etc. are concerned you've read about how crooked and corrupt a lot of them are, so broken down that we even have the Ontario Criminal Lawyer Association bringing it to the government and the AG's attention. Whether that'll do any good or not is questionable because as far as I'm concerned, the whole lot of them are less than honest (just to be polite!)but if it happened to one of theirs, you can bet your butt that they'd be the ones doing the screaming like we are now. Not that I wish any of them harm but wouldn't it be nice to see how they would feel and what they would do if it was one of their kids that was so horribly abused and then maybe we'd see some action but failing that, the laws of the Province are a joke and so is the government along with all of those groups I talked about above

.Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By armagedon, 6 hours ago | 1 Votes | Vote:

Unfortunately, this feeble inquiry won't do it, but it's time that the CAS was eliminated and a system of help and support set up that would truly look after the welfare of children. As amagedon points out, the CAS hides behind the law and is never held accountable. They've been corrupt and crooked since their inception and their directors get nice fat salaries and expense accounts while they waste untold hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. One of the best examples of the CAS criminal neglect is allowing and encouraging that the children in foster care be medicated to the gills with psychiatric drugs to keep them quiet about abuse and neglect. Nobody sticks up for the children. It's no wonder so many of them wind up addicted to drugs and in trouble with the law.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #3 By rehabguy, 3 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

Bet none of this will appear in the standard freeholder anytime soon right Claude nudge nudge wink wink

Reply | Report | Page Top  Post #4 By Dodger, 2 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

rehabguy, it's kind of late right now but I can get back here tomorrow and give you the names and e-mails of some MPPS directly involved in Bill 88 which is an ACT to give the Ombudsman's Office over-site and control over the the CAS and CCAS's when it comes to the complaints brought to his office. It's been stalled in the Legislature since it was introduced in 2006 so you can see what good Dalton and his gang of no goods have been up too, eh? Talk to you tomorrow.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #5 By armagedon, 3 mins ago | 

………………………………………………………………….……

Comments posted on Freeholder website in response to 28 February 2008 City lawyer decides not to return to inquiry

as far as im concerned mr. adams as a lawyer himself as come to realize,that he was part of the cover up at the begining of this whole affair.and had second thoughts about retestifing.out of sight out of mind.couldn<t at lease 1 of these high priced lawyers at this inquirey challenge the commisioner way way before now.or were they keeping this to give them an ace up there sleve.lets get on with all testimonys

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By luckyred, 16 mins ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

So when does Adams go to jail?? Do they have reservations beside Perry for him???

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By itinerant, 5 secs ago | 0 Votes | Vote

yes when does he get charged with contempt and sent to jail he is a vital link in the chain. the old let's cover our asses routine is happening again.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #3 By Dodger, 1 day ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

It wasn't that long ago, Claude McIntosh wrote quite an "editorial" emphacizing how badly he felt Sean was being treated and that Sean should be able to return to the stand to "clear his name" of any perceived negativity. McIntosh reiterated how "great" Sean Adams is and that he was beyond reproach. IN fact McIntosh as usual, maligned others, in his attempt to "rescue" Sean Adams ("Adams, Sherwood, Swabey & Follon").

Any "connections" Claude? HOW about an "editorial" explaining why "you" may have changed your mind, just as Sean has.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #4 By James "SPEAK OUT", 17 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote

……………………………………………………………….

Comments posted on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website in response to 27 February 2008 "Timeline:  the Silmser alleagtions" 

its to bad we can't hear off all the other things that went on. that wasn't wrote down but was only talked about or order from her bosses.Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By luckyred, 7 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

WOW
Somebody actually was paid to write this article. How do I seek such gainful employment as to cut and paste useless information? In the light of all this global warming concerns, why are we allowing news like this to be circulated?

It wastes paper and energyWhy do we always regurgitate all this nonsense?Maybe a good buggering of the judicial system is in order. It is amazing how people can be motivated under certain circumstances

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By itinerant, 7 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

……………………………………………………………………………

Comments posted on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website in response to 29 February 2008 “Witness allegations tossed out”My sister was in the foster system around Cornwall in the era that Mr.Bissonnette was in foster care. She witnessed some goings on in the foster home she was in although she was never herself abused there sahe tells me there were other young girls that were abused in that home and any complaint that was made to the cas and the police was dismissed as just not being true. The CAS to this day is one of the most powerful organizations around and they have more power than the police themselves. As for them protecting children I have my doubts about that! It did not surprise me that the police and the CAS would want to suppress evidence that would shine a bad spotlight on them after all they are the government and they do not make mistakes nor do they cover anything up.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By Dodger, 12 hours ago | 2 Votes | Vote:

Isn't it interesting that those who were there to protect us and failed to do that and or failed to ensure that it was done, have such immunity for their negligence? The CAS hides behind their Privacy Laws, the Ministry of Children's and Youth who can effect change by ensuring the CAS follow the Child and Family Services Act keep their mouths shut and let the OACAS spout out their propoganda. And then we have the cops who don't want to investigate the CAS's and hide behind their PSA and effectively allow the abuse to go on. The Ministry of C&Y funds the CAS's & CCAS's but under the ACT, if there is a rogue CAS or CCAS, the Ministry can step into that CAS Board and remove or replace any or all Board members of that CAS and appoint another hand picked person or group to run that CAS. Funny how we don't hear about about the Ministry not doing their job as they're the ones who are responsible at the end of the day. As far as I'm concerned, the biggest abusers of kids today are those groups (Police, CAS's, CCAS's and the Ministry of C&Y)and they are the ones who should be charged as well but when you have the AG and Min of Public Safety & Corrections not doing anything but covering their butts, well now you've got it. The protection of kids in both the CAS & CCAS has been butchered since its inception in the 1890's and nobody wants to do anything because once the lid of "Pandora's Box" has been lifted, EVERY single government and party has been negligent in taking proper care of these kids and that is criminal but nobody in any Province of Ontario government wants to reveal or accept the blame for their part. And as far as our wonderful judiciary, crowns, cops, etc. are concerned you've read about how crooked and corrupt a lot of them are, so broken down that we even have the Ontario Criminal Lawyer Association bringing it to the government and the AG's attention. Whether that'll do any good or not is questionable because as far as I'm concerned, the whole lot of them are less than honest (just to be polite!)but if it happened to one of theirs, you can bet your butt that they'd be the ones doing the screaming like we are now. Not that I wish any of them harm but wouldn't it be nice to see how they would feel and what they would do if it was one of their kids that was so horribly abused and then maybe we'd see some action but failing that, the laws of the Province are a joke and so is the government along with all of those groups I talked about above

.Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By armagedon, 6 hours ago | 1 Votes | Vote:

Unfortunately, this feeble inquiry won't do it, but it's time that the CAS was eliminated and a system of help and support set up that would truly look after the welfare of children. As amagedon points out, the CAS hides behind the law and is never held accountable. They've been corrupt and crooked since their inception and their directors get nice fat salaries and expense accounts while they waste untold hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. One of the best examples of the CAS criminal neglect is allowing and encouraging that the children in foster care be medicated to the gills with psychiatric drugs to keep them quiet about abuse and neglect. Nobody sticks up for the children. It's no wonder so many of them wind up addicted to drugs and in trouble with the law.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #3 By rehabguy, 3 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

Bet none of this will appear in the standard freeholder anytime soon right Claude nudge nudge wink wink

Reply | Report | Page Top  Post #4 By Dodger, 2 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

rehabguy, it's kind of late right now but I can get back here tomorrow and give you the names and e-mails of some MPPS directly involved in Bill 88 which is an ACT to give the Ombudsman's Office over-site and control over the the CAS and CCAS's when it comes to the complaints brought to his office. It's been stalled in the Legislature since it was introduced in 2006 so you can see what good Dalton and his gang of no goods have been up too, eh? Talk to you tomorrow.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #5 By armagedon, 3 mins ago | 

………………………………………………………………….……

Comments posted on Freeholder website in response to 28 February 2008 City lawyer decides not to return to inquiry

as far as im concerned mr. adams as a lawyer himself as come to realize,that he was part of the cover up at the begining of this whole affair.and had second thoughts about retestifing.out of sight out of mind.couldn<t at lease 1 of these high priced lawyers at this inquirey challenge the commisioner way way before now.or were they keeping this to give them an ace up there sleve.lets get on with all testimonys

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #1 By luckyred, 16 mins ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

So when does Adams go to jail?? Do they have reservations beside Perry for him???

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By itinerant, 5 secs ago | 0 Votes | Vote

yes when does he get charged with contempt and sent to jail he is a vital link in the chain. the old let's cover our asses routine is happening again.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #3 By Dodger, 1 day ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

It wasn't that long ago, Claude McIntosh wrote quite an "editorial" emphacizing how badly he felt Sean was being treated and that Sean should be able to return to the stand to "clear his name" of any perceived negativity. McIntosh reiterated how "great" Sean Adams is and that he was beyond reproach. IN fact McIntosh as usual, maligned others, in his attempt to "rescue" Sean Adams ("Adams, Sherwood, Swabey & Follon").

Any "connections" Claude? HOW about an "editorial" explaining why "you" may have changed your mind, just as Sean has.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #4 By James "SPEAK OUT", 17 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote

………………………………………………………………………….

Comments posted on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website in response to 26 February 2008 in response to “City police investigator won't testify at inquiry”  

sorry to hear this has affected constable sebalj.she has been also made a victim of thjs pedophiles.good luck and a speedy recovery.

How come ONE COP gets a get out of jail pass cause it may mentally hurt her and ONE COP GOES TO JAIL FOR THE SAME REASON???

YEP THIS IS CORNWALL JUSTICE!!! WAY TO GO INQUIRY WHAT A JOKE..BRITISH COLUMBIA STILL SUPPORTS PERRY

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By Hillside, 1 day ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

Heidi

Heidi I do not know much bout policing but I think you were pretty thorough.I recall two other officers in attendance with Heidi. Brian (Bus Driver) Snyder and another gentleman I cannot recall. Why are the other two officers not somewhat responsible for what was taking place. I believe Brian was senior to Heidi. Did they leave her out to dry?

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #4 By itinerant, 1 day ago | 0 Votes | Vote:

I also agree with Hillside. Perry and his family were basically driven out of Cornwall. They received numerous threats, and had to move. If you ask me, that alone would affect the Dunlop family mentally, and is still affecting them to this day. Why can't the inquiry use Perry's statements from 2000? A lot of people have testified in cases by way of sworn affidavits. This is indeed a JOKE.

…………………………………………………………………………..

Comments posted on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website in response to 26 February 2008 “Ex city cop won’t testify”

Thank you for your interpretation of my words, James. What I am saying is it would be good for everyone involved if we could receive facts from people present in certain circumstances ... all people. I believe if Ms. Sebalj said she ordered to hide the file that might help us all understand what was happening inside our city's police force at the time.  

I take great offense at your suggestion I am pretending nothing really happened and it was just a bad storm. It was a devastating series of events in our community and it continues to this day. You left this community, James, did you not? At least some of us had the mettle to stick it out here and try to get to the truth. I know it's not likely we'll ever actually find it, but at least we're trying. At least we're questioning things. I can't say for certain what would have happened between Ms. Sebalj and anyone she spoke with or received orders from. All I am saying is I'm disappointed she can't tell us herself.

My heart has been with the victims since day one, James, and my body has physically remained at their sides. I did not leave in order to build a better or different life. I did not abandon my home. I love this city, with all of its heartache and sadness and brilliance and joy. There are people I've met because of these investigations, the trials and this inquiry who have enriched my life beyond measure. It's these people for whom I hope someday, somehow, we'll know how it all went down. I'm not holding just my breath. I'm just keeping a quiet prayer for its possibility.

And it's certainly NOT that I don't believe Mr. Dunlop. I believe him without fail. I just wish the people in this community who DON'T believe him could hear the same stories he's been telling come out of the mouths of others. It would force the non-believers to at least consider the fact Mr. Dunlop has been telling the truth all along.

Dear "LOCAL READER": "touchy?"  

 Typically Cornwall. Let's try to shame or label people, who challenge us or oppose us. BELIEVE me, this will change; the people will "use" their voices and there will be "change".YOU seem to know a little about me. How much?I left Cornwall, in part, with my family, to survive and because I was threatened, by one of the accused; that's a good healthy decision, by the way. Oh, the accused, he "walked."

BELIEVE me, I may have moved, but I never left, as many, many people KNOW. Instead, you attempt to "shame" me, how typical.

I have one big chunk of flesh, in Cornwall.     

Also, I have many extended family members and friends, I visit often. Many Cornwall citizen's have told me, "this can only be fought and disclosed" from people outside the community.IF you know any more about me, you know how I have been fighting and for how long. I hope to help others WIN, "so-to-speak." DID you "speak-out" in the day or are you, for some reason, "in desperation" lately?HOWEVER, some people in Cornwall for whatever reason, "cannot or will not" come in "out of the storm", as you put it. THEY, for some reason cannot or will not see the light. IS it "blind faith" or "special interest."COMMENTS written on different blogs, such as written above and people, unwilling to testify, certainly, suggest "MANY" people know the facts, but "don't trust" and choose NOT, to come forward. THIS TOO, will change in Cornwall. 

Wouldn't you agree, many people ARE afraid to "speak out" or is it "raining too hard" where you are "sitting?"WHY do you think Heidi has been so disabled for so long. 

I suggest Heidi became a police constable with positive goals and an exciting career to look forward to. WHAT do you think happened?IF you have truly been around since 1993 and still see things as naively as you do, then, I can't say much more, neither can anyone.

BUT, there is NO doubt in my mind, many, many Cornwall citizen's KNOW the truth.NO, yet, once more, you are wrong and your attempt has failed, I've never really left Cornwall.

James P. Bateman
Kitchener, Ontario

You see conspiracy around every corner, James. I do not. But I can recognize it when I see it. It happened here, make no mistake about it. Not one word I've written suggests I believe otherwise. If you choose to read between my words and reach conclusions which suit your own agenda, I suppose I cannot stop you. But please do not assume to know my mind.

LocalReader and James "SPEAK OUT",You two are a perfect showing as to why this travesty can be exploited by our legal system. Do not fight amongst yourselves and there is no need for insults.Our system is so demented and designed to pit the innocent and the ignorant against each other. The media is distributes enough misinformation to fuel the fire. Tabloids like Osprey thrive on it. All the while the criminals go free and the legal system and politicians get rich.Turn your anger to the system and not each other

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #10 By itinerant, 44 mins ago | 0 Votes | Vote:…………………………………………………………………….

Comments posted on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website in response to 27 February 2008 “Evidence 'all over the place' in sex assault trial: lawyer”

so a victim is mistaken about who molested them i doubt that very much seems that is what the lawyers want us all to believe victims always remember who molested them because it affects them for the rest of their lives stop coddling the molesters start sentencing them properly for the crimes they have committed destroy a childs life then destroy their lives

i always wondered who in the hell would even consider defended piece of crap like them.they can,t need the work that bad could they.i hope its not paid for by legal aid

Comments posted on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website in response to 27 February 2008 “Former cop's psychologist should testify: attorney”

I would like to know how they are going to do this. Who was on the selection committee of this fine undertaking?"The inquiry is expected to hear from a number of witnesses in the coming weeks that will speak to how the Cornwall police force handled historical allegations of abuse"

I agree,I mean I'm not the brightest light in the room but even I understand Doctor/Patient confidentiality and also the Privacy Laws via the Information Privacy Commission so, good old frank and the coalition can file an FOI and they're concerned that the abuse is being covered up. My light might not be the brightest but it sure isn't as dim as the above mentioned. And I guess this good old frank hasn't heard of the PSA(Police Services Act), it's what cops use to hide behind just ask the Police Services in my old town and they blatantly lied regarding my case.Not wanting to insult the whole city of Cornwall but are people there that stupid or is there something to the concept about this whole alleged inbreeding thingee we keep hearing about?

Comments on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website in response to Ex-city cop won’t testify (26 February 2008)

I think you did a good job Heidi.

I must ask again has Brian (The Bus Driver) Snider been asked any questions yet? I remember Brian there as well during the interview, There was also another gentleman whom I cannot recall. All identified as someone from the local Police. Was Brian not a senior and able to aid you in your research? What about the other constable?Did they leave you out to dry, rather then practice due diligence?

I hope Ms. Sebalj is improving and I hope she can someday find peace and serenity in her life. I pray the same for everyone in this community.

Where have you been for all these years? IN the event Heidi did testify as to her "version", as you say, do you really believe she would have been "able" to disclose the facts?IF you are truly under the belief or "hope" that Heidi's "version" or "the bus driver's" version or countless others' "versions", would be an accurate depiction of the "facts", then all I can say is, please go back to your "Reader's Digest" and continue pretending, "nothing really happened...just a bad storm."

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #5 By James "SPEAK OUT", 47 secs ago | 0 Votes | Vote 

I agree, "itinerant". Point taken. I offer peace.

I agree, "itinerant". Point taken. I offer peace.

James

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #11 By James "Speak Out", 4 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote: ………………………………………………………………………. 

Comments on Perry Dunlop Target of Persecution, Freeholder Editorial 23 February 2008 

WAY TO GO, Joy. I agree with you. YOU and others are brave to "spaek out". KEEP IT UP!!SEE other blogs/comments by many people who share your opinion. (On other articeles/editorials on this "Standard-Freeholder" website, space. WAY TO GO!!

WEll Joy if you really want to help go on comp and search Perry Dunlop and you will get any info you need to help or read everything that has gone on since the beginng of this farce. You are right he should not be in jail for what he did. We have seen by what has gone on in this inquiry that there are many others who should be charged including the CAS for there lack of care of clients welfare.

Reply | Report | Page Top Post #2 By What Justice, 10 hours ago | 0 Votes | Vote  .

………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………..

……………………………………………………………………..

…………………………………………………………

I have never been so appalled with the justice system as I am now. I can't believe that Perry Dunlop and his family, having been through so much after he brought to light the corruption in our community through Project Truth, that has blackened our community for so many years, is being unfairly treated by our justice system. He gave up a career as a very efficient police officer to move his family as far away as he could, to protect them from harm. And now he is being treated like a criminal because he wouldn't testify to a situation that has become a circus to our justice system. For a man to protect children from being sexually abuse, and to bring it open to the officials of our community, he should be praised for his efforts, not condemned by the whole of the Canadian Justice system. It certainly doesn't shed a good light on our country or our justice system. And why, if he's not a flight risk, would such a man be handcuffed to appear in court, and why would such a good man be serving any time behind bars for something that could clean up a very bad situation. And why, can't he be out of jail during these hearings instead of serving behind bars? Is it because he has so many supporters behind him? And why would the inquiry lawyers be asking for six months of jail time? Are they afraid of the truth coming out? Or, are they covering up for some of the pedophiles that still remain ALIVE in our community?

If these allegations weren't truthful then why have so many Catholic priests been charged as accomplices to this pedophile ring, and why did the Catholic Church payoff one of the victims to keep silent? I am a true Catholic and have no mercy for any of the pedophiles that abused these young boys.

Mr. & Mrs. Gerald Davis

I hope that the Provincial Government will take measures to allow this man to return to his family without further discrimination to him or his family. I think it's time that the Provincial Government steps in and takes measures to alleviate any more harm to this poor man and his family.

This situation has become completely out of hand and I feel I speak for our entire community in this matter.

Reply | Report | Page Top

Post #8 By mrriverdale, 2 days ago | 2 Votes | Vote:

Pedophiles beware because if they ever find any of yous guilty all i have to say is jail is not a pretty place and let me tell ya you are going to be treated like the little ***es that yous are and hopefuly yous never make it to PC.

Reply | Report | Page Top

Post #9 By boone, 2 days ago | 2 Votes | Vote:

 who said no one would be presured or made to testify if they choose not to.i think this statement was put in by that wiesel claude what was this for to keep the peophilies out of the inquirey.people the commisioner of this inquirey can not be belived.he as shown this side of him more that once.i think he should be locked up.

Reply | Report | Page Top

Post #10 By luckyred, 2 days ago | 1 Vote   

…………………………………………………………………………….

18 February 2008

[Posted as a comment on Cornwall Standard Freeholder website]

Fellow posters, I have the privilege of calling Perry friend. We attended the same school and talked a couple times over beers as he entertained and local pubs. However writing these posts on the Osprey tabloid will do nothing to support him. Actions speak louder then words. Someone must come up with an alternate solution.

Perry refuses to partake in a system he does not believe in and is prosecuted for it. That is democracy at it’s best.

What about the politician that was going to present these issues in the house, he had evidence and information which somehow was modified. Is he going to jail for tampering with evidence, what about Adams he refused to listen to victims and with held information for years…will these people see their day?

By itinerant